THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- THE FEMALE EUNUCH
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG





His mommy put him to bed early.

(QS is best, forget the rest)
Download= http://www.quicksilvermail.net/
Tutorial= http://www.websamba.com/neone

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: What Did He Do?

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Anonymous <anonymous@invalid.com> wrote:

In article <43597cbd$0$11078$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:

Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too and this will be paradise for me!

Eelbash must not retire! He is the single most entertaining person in
here although he doesn't intend to be.

I read apas once a week and get great amusement out of reading
Eelbash's silly ideas for censoring (sorry I mean "stopping the
psychos"). I also enjoy reading his sock puppets where he tries to
pretend he's someone else that just happens to think and talk exactly
like him.

He is my internet soap opera. Eelbash must stay.

Wonderful entertainment that bloke.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Serious question, related to this "Pangborn" stuff

" krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:

DAVEY MOORE  -  AGAIN
"AD" <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote in message
news:VIZIJ8T738641.2290740741@reece.net.au...

"Jeffrey F. Bloss" <jbloss@tampabay.mapson.rr.com> wrote:

^  krp ! wrote:

    Sounds like RATIONALIZATION............... *I* have NEVER NEVER
NEVER
NEVER NEVER NEVER used a remailer. GOT IT MORON? NEVER!
I do NOT have the anonymizing software on my computers. PERIOD!

Message-ID: <TNK938ME38419.5208101852@reece.net.au>
Message-ID: <tjhXd.77945$Dc.44771@trnddc06>

The same message posted first through a remailer, then through your own
account.

In regard to the message IDs mentioned above, which are also mentioned on
the page www.aboutkenpangborn.com/altatheism.html.  To me this seems to
indicate that Kenny is guilty of the very offenses which he accuses others
of:  forging and harassing through the remailers. The message posted
through the remailer looks like it was a forgery of someone else in
another
group, and the fact that Kenny a short while later sent the exact same
text
from his known address makes it indeed seem that he was the forger.  Could
I be interpreting this wrong?

If he indeed is the sender, then it would seem he is delibarately abusing
remailers so that he can have more ammunition in his arguments here in
APAS.  I am curious to know how others may interpret these facts.

OF COURSE YOU DO DAVEY!

My name isn't Davey.  I know you're paranoid, kook, but perhaps you can get
the idea that everyone isn't "Moore".

And as usual, I note that you have no comments on the actual facts which
prove you again and again to be full of shit.