THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- THE HUMAN MAGGOT





lpar jgnY@O.Y'bY U$R,R

EelbashR


-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Serious question, related to this "Pangborn" stuff

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:

In article <FKGYEJYI38642.4598611111@reece.net.au>
Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:

you know, all you have to do is use common sense and have a bit of
decency and when somebody named john smith points out that he is being
harassed in some newsgroup you block mail to that newsgroup that
mentions john smith.

sure, there might be another john smith using the newsgroup, but the
chances are there is not and even if there is isn't it worth protecting
the victim john smith at the expense of the other john smith seeing his
name in the newsgroup if it happened to be mentioned in a message that
went through your remailer, which is pretty unlikely since this john
smith is not a victim so posts in the newsgroup mentioning his name
would probably come directly from the sender. and what are the chances
that both john smiths would be mentioned in posts coming through your
remailer at about the same time? pretty remote i would say.

it seems pretty simple to me and if you cannot see it maybe it is
because you do not want to see it.

it is clear to me as an observer that remailer operators are by and
large children and mentally ill 'adults'.

i wish Frog would return.

failing that I hope eelbash will continue rather than take another vacation.

aside from those two i have nothing but contempt for remailer operators
and think that pangborn is right and they are a lot of sickos playing
with toys, but with toys that can hurt people, and maybe it is best if
there is one too many free insane speech incidents and finally after one
more terrorist attack some demagogic privacy-hating politician manages
to get a law passed to shut down these pathetic and disgusting
children's toys because that is all they are.

of course all you mentally ill children will blame Frog rather than
yourselves.

We still know this is you Eelbash. Try harder next time.

Learn about word wrapping too Eelbash. You are a mentally ill whining baby.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Proof inside that claiming "no logs" is bullshit!

Nomen Nescio wrote:

"Hello, I am the owner of privacy.li. Today i saw some extra visitors,
so i checked where they came from and arrived here."

http://www.privacy.li/forum/viewtopic.php?t=308

No logs, huh?  Then how did you know there were "extra visitors" and
where they came from.  No logs=Bullshit!  You quite obviously log or you
would have absolutely now way to know any of this!

Well, you guys are really either stupid or someone pays you to spread
this FUD.

Can you imagine that privacy.li has a website at http://www.privacy.li,
which of course uses traffic analysis of its WEB SURFING VISITORS, to
see where they come from, what draws most interest, what key words are
scoring high, etc. Any business out there which is not doing this basic
analysis has no clue about what web visitors are interested in, and
therefor could not better or enhance their service...

However, this analysis is NOT matched with any individuals, but only in
a generic and general summary.

And to stretch your imagination a little bit further ->

In contrast to mere web visitors stands the service we offer:

We offer SSH2-accounts (Privacy-Tunnel) with full TOR entry points on
our servers (TOR-servers running, usage optional) for privacy loving
folks, and we DO NOT LOG ANY of the following:

1. we do NOT log your surfing behaviour, like which sites you visit
2. we do NOT log your email content
3. we do NOT log your traffic as in how many bytes you transferred
4. we do NOT log how many emails you sent or received
5. we do NOT log your chats like those in IRC and other IM-clients
6. we do NOT backup any of your data

So, we have perfect deniability, if we ever would get asked to produce
evidence about a client. What we don't know, we can not produce - it's
that easy!

Adminus

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Privacy.li - Being paranoid is a virtue, not a malfunction!
www.privacy.li or www.privacy.org.cn Visit our forums at:
www.privacy.li/forum
Anonymous domains + offshore hosting, anonymous banking, Privacy-tunnel,
market maker for digital gold currencies

"Fiat currencies don't float.  They just sink at different rates."
Open your free e-gold account today here:
https://www.e-gold.com/newacct/newaccount.asp?cid=385095