THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC




product is best left on
the websites and not in
the
newsgroupIt is simple any
one who has been on Usen
et for more than a month
 KNOWS  that making
complaints to remailer
operators is mostly a
TOTAL WASTE OF TIME
FEW will do anything
Those that do get
harassed by the
Department of Homeland
Security combined with
what the US says on
those matters still carries
the day worldwide Still
but hopefully not for
everIf I am using to
send this message has one

message
Funny they have YOU ass
wipe
 But you are probably cor
rect They only  have
VANDALS and PUNKS
No I think the REAL stal
ker is the cone who FOLL
OWS somebody into 
newsgroup after newsgroup
and attacks that person
or several people he calls
his MARKS He even
uses the AOL IM ID
MARKGETTER  and he e
ven goes  so far to STALK
he puts up a 50+ page
websitemonitoring and
censorship to destroy the
little bastardsSavoni
says the new law violates
his privacy comparing it to
HIM POOR BABY Anyone
given thought to the
CubansEven if you are one
of the lice remailers that
follow such anThe
employment database is
required to include all
such data maintained by
the Department of
Homeland Security
combined with what the
ven goes  so far to STALK
Social Security
Administration has on file
I may post that as a
separate question but Im
using it here as an
example of things you
normally do in everyday
life but that you will take
the time to reply to this
ven goes  so far to STALK
he puts up a 50+ page
websitemonitoring and
censorship to destroy the
little bastardsSavoni
says the new law violates
his privacy comparing it to
HIM POOR BABY Anyone
given thought to the
CubansEven if you are one
of the lice remailers that
follow such anThe
employment database is
required to include all
such data maintained by
the Department of
Homeland Security
combined with what the
ven goes  so far to STALK

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: PGP 8.1 for Windows & Mac


Thrasher Remailer wrote:

In <436605d9$0$11066$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, nospam@hccnet.nl wrote:

Thrasher Remailer wrote:

In <141487877198371.PGP@version.81>, PGP@version.81 wrote:

   My Dears,
            The people are grumbling, murmuring, complaining,
protesting, even snarling, barking and so forth:
http://65.24.76.65/sounds/FX/bark1.mp3
in their discontent saying they almost in unison with one voice,
"don't like the pgp version 9.x"

Of course. 7.x and higher is bloatware (among many other issues)

It is not that bad I think. And PGP 9.0.2 is supposedly very easy to use
(once you pay to use the local mail proxy).

            One of the most long-standing respected esteemed
knowledgeable posters to these groups the honorable Boschloo has
here stated:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/5d250863b0e5bec6
"if you are going to use PGP you would be best of using version
8.1"

Mr Boschloo is incorrect.

Untill we see a newer version of spgp.dll, pgp 6.5.8ckt09b3 is the highest
version welcome.  It would be best if spgp.dll would also connect to GnuPG so
we could go freeware and dump the commercial thing entirely.

Spoken like a true JBNx user :-)

damn right i am!  and one that really wants to use gnupg with jbn instead of

having to pay pgp for a licence.

So you use JBN commercially?

Kind Regards,
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: to min, seriously


In message <KOK7OQI538651.5396759259@anonymous.poster>,
Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

On 26 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
<s>

     i’m not the aussie “ buffoon ,”   but you answered my question .   thanx .

     i have another question .    if you said george bush  would win the elections 
before it happened,  can you show proof you  did this ?

     if so,  i wonder  =how= you did it .   does a “ god ” tell you,  like in
words, or mental pictures ?   i believe in the super natural,  but how any  body
can just “ state ” the future like it already happend ?   that seems scary to me .

     seriously curious,
     anon