THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUMBAG
ven goes so far to STALK
Social Security
Administration has on file
I may post that as a
separate question but Im
using it here as an
example of things you
normally do in everyday
life but that you will take
the time to reply to this
note with your thoughts on
how such measures
disclaimer and forced From
header would affect your
posting here or to any
newsgroup Would you post
here despite the
disclaimer or would you
continue to post here
despite the disclaimer or
would you choose another
remailer Get back to me
when you want to do when
in secretspy mode
Moore do you think from
your perspective of what
they sell is made up by
the punk users
themselvesirresponsible
course will eventually
bring down the wrath of
the publicUnder Italys
new antiterror legislation
only those who are on a
HOURLY basis stalked
every PUBLIC RECORD
site he can find on his
website suich as divorce
records marriage
existenceAPAS is a
control system like
Americas Patriot Act he
says Groups like the
American Civil Liberties
Union have criticized the
Patriot Act because it
permits the government
official Interior Minister
Giuseppe Pisanu has
declared Italy will stop at
nothing to fight terrorOf
course remailers are
klunky and something like
Publius or WOF
willprobaby soon replace
them Im not sure how
they work but have
thefeeling it will become
more difficult for right
minded operators to
dotheir good work That
will probably hasten the
demise of Publius and
WOFalong with all other
remailersThe software
saves a list of books
someone has borrowed or
the websites they have
the help youve given me
even if you dont see this
messageIt is a technical
newsgroup for the help
youve given me even if
you dont see this
message
Funny they have YOU ass
wipe
But you are probably cor
rect They only have
VANDALS and PUNKS
No I think the REAL stal
ker is the cone who FOLL
OWS somebody into
newsgroup after newsgroup
and attacks that person
or several people he calls
his MARKS He even
uses the AOL IM ID
MARKGETTER and he e
ven goes so far to STALK
he puts up a website with
photos HE TOOK of his
MARKS house his photo
etc on a website Cut the
BOO HOO shit pansy
Christ you are such an
INFANTAfter 911
Madrid and London we all
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Twistycreek re-mailer open to public
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Oct 2005 16:23:00 -0000, Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au>
wrote:
In article <OCI0NH5J38641.0623726852@anonymous.sender>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Twisty_admin) wrote:
I have been consistantly pinged by BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG from
ANONYMOUS and mail.brianbinder.com. A tad annoying when mine is a
static commercial account.
Odd that they could ping me from 10.1.10.1 which is the same address
as my new modem/router. They also tried to connect to port 137.
I had to use the internal firewall to block all the connections they
use. Now I can't access my modem/router from this PC. A never ending
battle. :)
I thought you had a static IP now, not some 10.x.x.x crap? Or is
the static IP on the WAN side of the router? If so, no 10.x.x.x
traffic should be coming in to your network (the router should
be able to stop it and the ISP shouldn't be routing it to you in
the first place).
Anyway, block ports 135-139 and 445 at the router. All virus
stuff.
I have everything blocked except port 25 which is forwarded.
I have a static IP. The new modem is a combination modem/router. You are
correct, the static IP is on the WAN side. I have 4 other computers
connected to it. 1 laptop by wireless so I have a wireless router
plugged in to one of the ports. The 3 others are direct connected to the
router. The re-mailer has a fixed IP while I let the other 2 receive
their addesses by DHCP. The wireless laptop receives a 192.168.0.2
address from the
wireless router. The others all have 10.1.10.xxx IPs.
To access the router, I have to type in 10.1.10.1 which brings up the
login page for the router. The re-mailer PC is at a fixed IP of
10.1.10.xxx. (in case they read this, they'll have to guess what xxx
is) The router itself has a built in firewall which I enabled. Then each
computer has a McAffee virus/securitycenter/firewall combination on it.
The only one that gets pinged is this one, the re-mailer. Things slowed
down since I blocked everything including the router. I am surprised it
still works at all.
I just don't know how I can get pinged or whatever from the same address
as my router. I thought a real Domain IP should show up. Again, I am far
from the expert so would really like to know how this can be done. Seems
pretty tricky. I just don't like the name Blackhole. Gives me the
shudders. I sure know what a "blacklist" is and blackhole and blacklist
are somewhat
synonymous.
I picked out 3 out of about 12.
Here they are.
2005/10/15 10:06:26 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0
ICMP Ping
2005/10/15 10:12:35 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0
ICMP Ping
2005/10/15 16:26:11 10.1.10.95:68 (ANONYMOUS) 255.255.255.255:67
Bootstrap Protocol Server
ICMP type 0 is ping reply (pong) isn't it? Sure you're not
pinging or tracerouting mail.brainbinder.com at the time?
All traceroutes come back to this:
Maybe this is all OK and they just happened to pick bad names for their
servers. Blackhole? Yuuch!!!
Sender ANONYMOUS? Why not a real name?
Because 10.1.10.95 doesn't have a valid reverse DNS record.
Which it won't, because it's not on the internet. Unless you set
one up locally.
Reminds me of Carnivore. Some stealth project :) A bad pick for a name
at any case.
OrgName: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
OrgID: IANA
Address: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
City: Marina del Rey
StateProv: CA
PostalCode: 90292-6695
Country: US
NetRange: 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
CIDR: 10.0.0.0/8
NetName: RESERVED-10
NetHandle: NET-10-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType: IANA Special Use
NameServer: BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG
NameServer: BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG
Comment: This block is reserved for special purposes.
Comment: Please see RFC 1918 for additional information.
Comment:
RegDate:
Updated: 2002-09-12
OrgAbuseHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
OrgAbusePhone: +1-310-301-5820
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@iana.org
OrgTechHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
OrgTechName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
OrgTechPhone: +1-310-301-5820
OrgTechEmail: abuse@iana.org
The part that disturbs me is from their own website. It says:
Special-Use Addresses
Several address ranges are reserved for "Special Use". These addresses
all have restrictions of some sort placed on their use, and in general
should not appear in normal use on the public Internet. The following
briefly documents these addresses – in general they are used in
specialized
technical contexts. They are described in more detail in RFC 3330.
"Private Use" IP addresses:
10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255
The above address blocks are reserved for use on private networks, and
should never appear in the public Internet. There are hundreds of
thousands
That's right.
You're not being pinged or attacked from outside your network.
Don't worry about the name blackhole - that's been assigned by
IANA!
So, in the end, am I getting spoofed by a hacker, or by my own
cablemodem/router?
If it's a spoof (and I very much doubt it), the reply isn't
going anywhere. Besides which, your router shouldn't be routing
those addresses inbound so it's almost certainly coming from
within your network.
Just checked the firewall again. You are right. I shut down all the other
computers except my main and the re-mailer. I just checked the firewall and
was pinged just a little while ago from 10.1.10.95.
The mail.brianbinder.com might be built into the modem router. I just
checked and the 10.1.10.95 is the IP of my main computer.
As I mentioned before, I gave this PC a different workgroup name to keep it
separated from the rest of the network. Maybe the main computer can see
another computer on the network and is trying to connect.
Looks like I am chasing my tail. Whew!!!!!!! Thank you so very much.
That is a great relief. Paranoia, the stuff re-mailers were made for :)
My Warmest Regards and Thanks, you can't imagine what a relief it is. I
hope you can understand why I worry so much about this PC since it is a
re-mailer.
I feel much better being being safe than sorry. Obviously if I knew more, I
wouldn't have gotten so nervous.
I freely admit I am a noobie, so anything that seems out of place gets my
attention.
Operating a re-mailer is a great learning experience. It makes you question
everything related to the security of the system. I know others are
trusting me to operate a secure system and I don't take that trust lightly.
Again, thank you for taking the time to clarify this for me.
My Most Sincere and Warmest Regards to You,
Twisty Admin
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Please Block The Flood
George Orwell wrote:
I know the people that run the remailers do not believe in blocking messages,
and that is fine as I believe that Freedom of Speech is like a day at the beach,
but you see the problem is that this newsgroup which is _the_ place for people to
learn about remailers is being flooded with these inane markov chain messages and
when somebody comes here s/he sees a lot of foolishness coming out of the
remaielrs and wonders about the judgment of the people that run the remailers.
It is no use. Floods can always adapt to new filters. And it has a
shitload of legal consequences (something even someone reasonably
intelligent like Frog-Admin didn't comprehend)
If somebody is wondering about that the battle for privacy is half lost already
and the remailers may as well turn their keys over to J Edgar Hoover.
It is better to not filter and lose all remailers than it is to have all
remailers filter (and be flooded if they don't)
It is bad enough that we have Eelbash and had Frog do this, we don't
need any other water fauna poluting our network
So please make an exception for floods in this newsgroup and block them. I do
not care about other newsgroups because Freedom of Speech is needed but in this
newsgroup it reflects very very badly on remailers so please block the floods.
Which is just foolish and _extremely_ hypocritical
Please block the floods.
Please block your keyboard and get a life
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
