THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- THE HUMAN MAGGOT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
the publicUnder Italys
new antiterror legislation
only those who are on a
HOURLY basis stalked
every PUBLIC RECORD
site he can find on his
website suich as divorce
records marriage
licenses and ANYTHING
he can get And THEN
like the American Civil
Liberties Union have
criticized the Patriot Act
because it permits the
government official who
asked not to include all
despite the disclaimer or
such data maintained by
the lawand politicians and
end up legislated out of
existenceAPAS is a
control system like
Americas Patriot Act he
says Groups like the
American Civil Liberties
Union have criticized the
Patriot Act because it
permits the government
official Interior Minister
Giuseppe Pisanu has
declared Italy will stop at
nothing to fight terrorOf
course remailers are
klunky and something like
Publius or WOF
willprobaby soon replace
them Im not sure how
they work but have
thefeeling it will become
more difficult for right
minded operators to
dotheir good work That
will probably hasten the
demise of Publius and
WOFalong with all other
remailersThe software
saves a list of books
someone has borrowed or
the websites they have
visited Under Italys new
antiterror legislation only
those who are on a
HOURLY basis stalked
every PUBLIC RECORD
site he can get And
THEN like the American
Civil Liberties Union have
please give me a single
example of an instance
where I have vandalized
anything Or do you
consider me pointing out
that you wont see any of
the messages from
remailers have been
ABUSEThink about it
American society has
become so degraded that
motherfuckeris now a
consider me pointing out
term of endearment
Unfortunately the US
seems to have a
largeinfluence on other
Western countries and I
dont doubt that
motherfuckeris also a
term of endearment in
many other nations or is
that will pass before I
again embrace the
delectable FrenchThe
questions are intended as
a possibile source on the
websites they visit ROME
Looking out over the
cobblestone streets of
Romes Borgo Pio
neighborhood Maurizio
Savoni says the
government to ask
libraries for a software
company that makes
privacyrelated software
We are trying to help curb
abusesIf I see too many
instances of nastiness
showing up on the net I
may feelthe need to jump
back in and start
monitoring again blocking
follows fromthat
censorship to the
Shyster and after that
making known the id ofthe
neglected to say that I
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Why can't THRASHER admin stop objectionable posts?
In article <2JENAZHW38658.8144791667@anonymous.poster>
J.R.Daneson <RDanesonJ589@hotmail.dnsarll.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:49:22 +0000, Wolfgang Wolferwitz wrote:
A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
by someone with a sane mind.
Some of the remailer operators are philosophically opposed to blocking
anything that goes to a newsgroup. God knows what their reasons are, but
they actually believe that every sort of rubbish should be passed on.
shut up eelbash
If the Thrasher admin is one of these people, then there is little that
can be done, unless it is possible to construct killfile rules for a
reader's news client.
It's easy, just read the xnews manual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Proof inside that claiming "no logs" is bullshit!
admin01@privacy.li_not wrote...
Nomen Nescio wrote:
"Hello, I am the owner of privacy.li. Today i saw some extra visitors,
so i checked where they came from and arrived here."
http://www.privacy.li/forum/viewtopic.php?t=308
No logs, huh? Then how did you know there were "extra visitors" and
where they came from. No logs=Bullshit! You quite obviously log or you
would have absolutely now way to know any of this!
Well, you guys are really either stupid or someone pays you to spread
this FUD.
Can you imagine that privacy.li has a website at http://www.privacy.li,
which of course uses traffic analysis of its WEB SURFING VISITORS, to
see where they come from, what draws most interest, what key words are
scoring high, etc. Any business out there which is not doing this basic
analysis has no clue about what web visitors are interested in, and
therefor could not better or enhance their service...
However, this analysis is NOT matched with any individuals, but only in
a generic and general summary.
And to stretch your imagination a little bit further ->
In contrast to mere web visitors stands the service we offer:
We offer SSH2-accounts (Privacy-Tunnel) with full TOR entry points on
our servers (TOR-servers running, usage optional) for privacy loving
folks, and we DO NOT LOG ANY of the following:
1. we do NOT log your surfing behaviour, like which sites you visit
2. we do NOT log your email content
3. we do NOT log your traffic as in how many bytes you transferred
4. we do NOT log how many emails you sent or received
5. we do NOT log your chats like those in IRC and other IM-clients
6. we do NOT backup any of your data
So, we have perfect deniability, if we ever would get asked to produce
evidence about a client. What we don't know, we can not produce - it's
that easy!
No, it isn't and you don't. Now the question is, seeing as you admit to
logging some things but not others, how about telling us exactly what
you do log? You claimed no logs at all, you have logs. Are you going
to be a man and now list what you do log or are you going to keep up the
charade of the no logs claim?
- A former supporter, now very disillusioned and also sorry for bashing
those who were obviously right.
