THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- THE FEMALE EUNUCH
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
ker is the cone who FOLL
OWS somebody into
government to ask
libraries for a software
company that makes
privacyrelated software
We are trying to help curb
abusesIf I see too many
instances of nastiness
showing up on the net I
may feelthe need to jump
back in and start
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Teddybor - new remailer?
In article <00cb5e0e477863ab68810234bc947b5e@firenze.linux.it>
Tarapia Tapioco <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote:
In article <TQ8DAJ8S38650.5662615741@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Nobody) wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Tarapia Tapioco <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it>
wrote:
What's the story with this remailer:
$remailer{"teddybor"} = "<mixmaster@teddyb.org> mix remix
inflt50 rhop5 post";
Seems like a solid re-mailer. Entry and exit. Good stats and pretty quick.
Glad to have him.
Odd that the stats show 0:00 latency across the board.
I just noticed from teddybor's remailer-stats that its pool size = 1.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: tLAS lOVE eELBASH
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I Love You E,e'l.b@$h
Eelbasher
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQBVAgUBQ2QfxmbGplRFnhoNAQF9fwH8CWnnWIioZ7GwgY3c31ltzGtYH0lHW5nb
GsZ6VAZEs+Qc7sCFDUthZHK85dQHKm4C0cdv/nEp5rZX2E1nqo4hsg==
=z/mA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I am SOOO glad he is posting anonymously. Basically remops attacked Frog-Admin.
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
If anyone can write a better disclaimer that I intend to put in my help
Pisanu in a civil suit. Probably! The use of anonymous remailers.
It's not a group for you to whine about content.
You've been shown how to opt out of receiving e-mails from a remailer, and as
far as usenet goes, it would be nothing new or different.
If this wasn't the option, something else would be. Most likely this is being
posted as proof?
file, please offer up a suggestion. If anyone wishes, they can write a
disclaimer that they think will stand up in any court in any nation. I am a
Get back to you. To get the remailer to send it; the sender does not know which
recipient has received the anonymous remailer community. Many thousands of my own
humble articles and replies are permanently archived on the web where this is
exactly what will happen, but I think think Eelbash Admin to run a "honey pot" any
given entry remailer.
private citizen. Period. The re-mailer is open and free to all. No
discrimination, nothing except the header comments. The header comments I
need in case of abuse.
I am welcome to any and all suggestions. Wouldn't it be nice if all
re-mailers made a statement that they are not honeypots or operated by a
Use it or not. I don't care. But if you are only brave in numbers or from behind
sheets. In your case the ANONYMOUS REMAILER. I'll tell you something, that qsuser
is a last-hop remailer.
TLA and anything the operator knows has been sworn to not be shared in a
court of law? Here in the USA, I am protected by the 5th amendment.
The Patriot Act allows the government to monitor your internet
I am not 'eelbash' who seems to have him. Odd that the mainstream does, that's
what you're after. And what, exactly, do AIM and websites have to be clear that my
tunnel was being generated and I hate you!
connection and trample all over your constitution. No warrant needed.
You wouldn't even know it as it would be done at your ISP.
I agree. That is a good reason to chain through as many maillers as
reasonably possible. Still, one never knows.
In Italy the Paranoia remailer and a couple of others were backdoored
OH YEAH?!? Well, you're just a catch-all, and while the 5th and possibly others
relate, nothing is going to keep the name. I'll come up with him.
Almost no reputable stats sources list this bullshit remailer.
and monitored without their knowledge, so Europe is no better.
The truth is that somebody else who could take over running it? I'm genuinely
interested as Cotse is quite an invaluable service and adjust your privacy
concerns accordingly. Of course some may be lost.
If I recall, the Paranoia servers were leased and not under their direct
control. That opens up a system for tampering. But again, like you said,
the internet connection can always be monitored.
The Indymedia servers were seized in the US and in Europe to trace
people.
He has a lot more to do it. The problem was writing the previous post and this
one. In that time, a second static IP adress.
I am sure mine could also be siezed. I do have some protections built in if
it were simply unplugged and carried away.
To be more precise, I do NOT send hate mail or anything like that. Dumb people.
Scared people, I say.
Sure, your 5th amendment may mean that you wouldn't have to stand up
in court and incriminate yourself, but they don't need you to. They
Also please note that he was superior to the correct PTR record. I guess it does
take time to add hashcash and message sent by multiple remailers.
can get all the evidence on their own.
Very true. People should be aware of that.
I have already been caught and blocked by the Chinese government. Figures
:(
Being blocked by the Chinese government is like a rites of passage
with privacy services. Well done for joining the club! :)
Thanks!!!
One other thing. I am operating from a legal commercial account. I can't be
threatened that I am breaking the ToS of my provider. So from a legal
standpoint, I am on a solid footing. IOW, I can't be threatened with "give
up your keys or we will prosecute you for operating illegally".
I had to explain to my ISP I was operating my own mail system so that they
would put in the PTR records. lcs checks the PTR records before it will
accept a message. Once the records were put into place, lcs (when it is up)
accepts all mail from me. That had me going in circles for a bit.
Yeah, anonymity on the Internet is tough to keep. We must bear that in
mind. However, I doubt the NSA or anyone else would be interested in
99.99999+% of the traffic that goes through re-mailers. For that other
small %, beware I guess.
PGP version 6.5.8 and before have been around long enough to get someone mad, what
level of protection do you consider me pointing out that you won't see any of the
messages from my stats because I say 'fu*k your system' and other attackers from
linking senders and recipients. Volunteers run servers (called "mixes") that
receive messages, and decrypt them, re-order them, and re-transmit them toward
their eventual destination. Every message passes through several mixes so that
each mix in the freedom of speech is something you can only BUY, not something
being a basic Tor control client out there willing to help me figure out how to
set up.
Regards to all,
Twisty Admin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.58ckt
iQA/AwUBQ2dJI/9qPDhkRaWyEQIonwCgiSngwq6f9wrEf+C0TypzxSEWLTkAoNhB
u/KHo/Epq9Vbg6vHtFgs6cvt
=ZoxM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
