THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- THE HUMAN MAGGOT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING






  In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
  Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
 

It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
adult remailer system by running Bushwa.

 
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum.  He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
Yes, those actually were his reasons.

This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.

Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).

So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".

He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.

So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
The ones we know about are:


 eelbash
 axloltl
 axolotl2
 cheshire
 congo
 bog
 bogg
 eelbash (again)
 bushwa
 greatwall
 asmodeus
 eelbash (again!)
 eelbash (again!!)
 
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return,
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading
people's posts and emails AGAIN.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Moron flooder  "eelbash"  was "Frog"

In article <4354e2e9$0$11070$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:

Whatever it is, it is decremental to the status remailer users have on
usenet. Remops where never liked by the majority of internet users IMHO.

Screw 'em.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

<<==========>>

Subject: Why can't EELBASH admin stop insulting our intelligence?


Anyone who is the least bit familiar with eelbash knows for a fact that the
message about Thrasher *AND* the reply to it were both written by eelbash.

This is one of his standard complaints, trotted out in one of his usual
ways. Hell, I would not be surprised even a tiny bit to find out that the
offending messages were actually *SENT* by eelbash himself, to give him
something to complain about.

The trouble is that we are not as stupid as eelbash seems to think we are.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Spooks

Jeffrey F. Bloss wrote:

Olitoktali Mihnjihnfui wrote:

Well, it surely has been asked before, but, how is one to know (believe)
 that the CIA spooks are completely plugged into the mixmaster network?

You can't know. That's the reason the remailer software is designed with
the idea that at least some of the network is compromised. Why layered
encryption, remixing, latency, and fragmentation exist. And it's pretty
tough to wrap your brain around the possibility that the *whole* remailer
network is CIA owned... but I suppose it's a possibility.

So run your own remailer if you're ultra paranoid. You'll know that at
least *one* node is safe to use. <g>

The problem with the paranoid imagination is that it has no boundaries.
   So. As a paranoid, to close the loop, I would need to understand the
very source code and algorithm of mixmaster to be certain that there was
no backdoor key.  And that, I am afraid, is an impossibility for this
here individual.  Thus, the paranoia.  Paranoia is inherent in this
whole process of anonymous remailing, isn't it!