THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG






  In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
  Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
 

It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
adult remailer system by running Bushwa.

 
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum.  He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
Yes, those actually were his reasons.

This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.

Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).

So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".

He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.

So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
The ones we know about are:


 eelbash
 axloltl
 axolotl2
 cheshire
 congo
 bog
 bogg
 eelbash (again)
 bushwa
 greatwall
 asmodeus
 eelbash (again!)
 eelbash (again!!)
 
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return,
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading
people's posts and emails AGAIN.

<<==========>>

Subject: sbulekc dips htiw L.E.e live eht hsab nemrehsiF


ufnoyrR hbY rJbL ri

Eelbasher

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Nym creation with Panta - a one way street?

In article <NORWY52R38665.765625@anonymous.poster>
panta-admin <anonymous@panta-rhei.dyndns.org> wrote:

Re-send your reply block to "save AT nym.panta-rhei.eu.org"

Let me clarify this a bit more:
Please create your config message in the normal way, but then send it to
save@... instead of config@....

Thank you for the reply. I have re-sent the configuration
message to the above address and I'll look forward to your reply.


Following my previous message, I should add this comment: I sent
an anonymous message to me using the same remailers as the reply
block, but I didn't receive a reply. There are two
possibilities. Either one of the remailers has a problem or the
administrator of the final destination email address blocks or
rejects emails from anonymous remailers.

If it's the latter case, can you suggest a reliable final
destination email address to use, for example if a webmail
address, then which one could I reliably use?