THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG






  In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
  Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
 

It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
adult remailer system by running Bushwa.

 
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum.  He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
Yes, those actually were his reasons.

This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.

Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).

So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".

He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.

So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
The ones we know about are:


 eelbash
 axloltl
 axolotl2
 cheshire
 congo
 bog
 bogg
 eelbash (again)
 bushwa
 greatwall
 asmodeus
 parsifal
 eelbash (again!)
 eelbash (again!!)
 
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return,
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading
people's posts and emails AGAIN.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Reasons to avoid Eelbash

Eelbasher <eelbasher@eelbash.yi.org> writes:

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
The ones we know about are:


eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus
eelbash (again!)
eelbash (again!!)

Hey! My remop hero is Ms Parsifal. Quit dissing her.

Starbuck

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again

Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:30:37 -0800, nonalt wrote:

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:

7 years running remailers; 30 years programming while also running a
business; 3 years in the army conducting electronic warfare against the
commies.  What's not to trust?

YOU. More lies. Whatever happened to the story about running remailers
for 15 years, before they even existed. Oh, wait,  you were busted and
publicly branded a "LIAR". So now you bump it down to 7 years. Gotcha.

Of course I was lying about running a remailer for 15 years. I have
enough respect for the intelligence of my readers to know that they would
know there were no remailers 15 years ago; I just thought that people
would have enough of a sense of humor to get a laugh out of such a
ludicrous claim.

Even 7 years may be a bit of an exaggeration - there have been so many
remailers it's hard to remember - maybe 7 years - could be; maybe 6 -
something like that anyway.

30 years programming, yeah, right. I know for a fact where you got the
base VB module you've been dicking around with. Care to share with the
group, liar?

Sure. I programmed COBOL and a little PL-1, and even a touch of Assembler,
for 30 years, along with a couple of scripting languages - nothing like VB
(CLIST and REXX to be exact), taught myself the rudiments of visual basic
in the 1990s, and am still at the rudimentary stage.

I guess I've gone as far as I'll go with it, given my decreasing desire to
become more competent in it, let alone the actuarial tables.

By the way, 30 years ago VB did not exist, though you don't seem to have
known that.

The base VB modules you are talking about, though you don't know you are
talking about them, came from Frog Admin's site. I used them to do the
basic I/O and picked up other things from them.

The base VB module you *think* you are talking about was emailed to me by
the Dingo admin. I glanced at it, and realized it would be more work than
I wanted to do to adapt my rudimentary VB knowledge to the way Dingo admin
had coded his module (his was much superior to my klunky stuff, I might
add), so, other than glancing at it, I never used it, and have long since
discarded it.

Listen, this remailer stuff is just a hobby when you come right down to
it; don't waste your indignation on something so piddly.

I admit that's advice I also need to take on occasion, but it's much more
important for you to accept it.