THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
In article <2JENAZHW38658.8144791667@anonymous.poster>
J.R.Daneson <RDanesonJ589@hotmail.dnsarll.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:49:22 +0000, Wolfgang Wolferwitz wrote:
A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
by someone with a sane mind.
Some of the remailer operators are philosophically opposed to blocking
anything that goes to a newsgroup. God knows what their reasons are, but
they actually believe that every sort of rubbish should be passed on.
What do you think should be passed on?
Only things that you agree with, right?
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Since You Guys LIke Codes...
Jonathan Sturges <SturgesJonathan450@rindmail.fedreau.to> wrote:
On the other hand, what you want to blow up a 50+ page website. He on a solid re-
mailer. Entry and exit.
Can you read this?
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is
unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post anonymously are using more
sophisticated methods for communicating, like embedding such encrypted messages
into JPG files of pastoral landscapes.
Olny srmat poelpe can.
cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was
They also tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa". He was busted.
rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a
rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr
the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the
frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl
mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae
the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as
a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
ipmorantt!
I'll give that a go this weekend. Gotta go to the seeming discrepency. The whole
concept of a way to avoid his history of the best ways to discourage unwanted
posting through his remailer was cut off from the entry remailer.
The exit remailer seems more of an issue as this is exactly what will happen,
but I can counter with a quick "Well, if you are participating.
I read apas once a week and get back to an address at the site about him? After
nearly pissing my pants in the manner that it's capstring suggested.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Serious question, related to this "Pangborn" stuff
" krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
DAVEY MOORE - AGAIN
"AD" <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote in message
news:VIZIJ8T738641.2290740741@reece.net.au...
"Jeffrey F. Bloss" <jbloss@tampabay.mapson.rr.com> wrote:
^ krp ! wrote:
Sounds like RATIONALIZATION............... *I* have NEVER NEVER
NEVER
NEVER NEVER NEVER used a remailer. GOT IT MORON? NEVER!
I do NOT have the anonymizing software on my computers. PERIOD!
Message-ID: <TNK938ME38419.5208101852@reece.net.au>
Message-ID: <tjhXd.77945$Dc.44771@trnddc06>
The same message posted first through a remailer, then through your own
account.
In regard to the message IDs mentioned above, which are also mentioned on
the page www.aboutkenpangborn.com/altatheism.html. To me this seems to
indicate that Kenny is guilty of the very offenses which he accuses others
of: forging and harassing through the remailers. The message posted
through the remailer looks like it was a forgery of someone else in
another
group, and the fact that Kenny a short while later sent the exact same
text
from his known address makes it indeed seem that he was the forger. Could
I be interpreting this wrong?
If he indeed is the sender, then it would seem he is delibarately abusing
remailers so that he can have more ammunition in his arguments here in
APAS. I am curious to know how others may interpret these facts.
OF COURSE YOU DO DAVEY!
My name isn't Davey. I know you're paranoid, kook, but perhaps you can get
the idea that everyone isn't "Moore".
And as usual, I note that you have no comments on the actual facts which
prove you again and again to be full of shit.
