THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER




Anonymous <mixmaster2@ito.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:


And no, I would be protected from the speeds I mentioned. No, I will never take
over APA-S while I (and others) have access to.  Thus the Admin would setup and
run all remailer services off of said server that only they have visited. Under
Italy's new antiterror legislation, only those who are on a HOURLY basis stalked
every PUBLIC RECORD site he can get,.

And anyone who's been here for over a year knows that this flood of
anti-eelbash spam drivel is by Bluejay (aka Michael Gardner) abusing the
remailers.  And no, this isn't Eelbash either.  I don't use him because he
changes his configurations more often than his underwear.  But anyone with

You can examine this directory by hand, or with usenet distribution? I find it
hard to believe that somebody's trying to post anonymously to usenet and snipe
nasty messages attacking their betters. Get real, and start acting responsibly. I
wish Frog would return.

half a brain knows this Eelbasher flood is Bluejay's doing.

<<==========>>

Subject: Unconfirmed nyms and Reply Block updates?

This is related to another posting that I made about creating
nyms that are not confirmed because they have problematic reply
blocks.

My question is, can I *change* a reply block of a nym that I
created, *before* I confirmed the nym creation (including the
reply block) to the nym server? If this is not possible, then my
nym would be worthless and unusable.

I shall of course try and test this, but I'm wondering if a
knowledgeable person could clarify this anyway.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Moron flooder  "eelbash"  was "Frog"


Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:

In article <43541fd2$0$74666$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net>
"Ryugyong Hotel" <spamless@nospam.com> wrote:

Same guy, unemployed idiot, spinning up/down "eelbash"
Did the same with "Frog" two years ago
*God is going to get you.*

No.
 .The old flood was massive and sophisticated, carried out BY Frog.
 .The new one is puny and unsophisticated, carried out BY eelbash.
 .God could not care less about such things.

Maybe they're related. Join the family! Be a responsible remop! Flood
usenet through your competitors!

Maybe flooding usenet (through your competitors) is part of some
initiation ritual. Flood usenet undected for a couple of years and you
become one of us!

(both) Their true purpose will probably never been known. I think there
is more at play here then just inflated egos.

Whatever it is, it is decremental to the status remailer users have on
usenet. Remops where never liked by the majority of internet users IMHO.

Regards,
Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR