THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:
This whole group got flooded much worse than now by Eelbash for many
years and even when I was in a mental institution for a couple of months
the flooding continued (and I was on dail up at the time to add to
that). Then Frog-Admin announces his remailer gone and so are the floods
all of the sudden.
Flawed logic I think Thomas. You're suggesting Frog's demise and the end of
the flooding make the two synonymous. It's equally likely that some other
person who had an obsession with FrogAdmin simply stopped flooding when
Frog went away. There's really no way to know for sure.
Not that I'm defending anyone mind you.
Then Eelbash comes (worse in some ways to Frog-Admin but less damaging
in other ways because noone takes him seriously). And then the minor
floods come.
I'm not even sure I'd call a couple days of random text a flood, but I
suppose that's subjective.
1. I think the floods are linked to remailer load.
Lost me. ???
2. I think someone who hates remailers is behind it.
I think someone who cares little one way or the other is behind it. I think
someone is doing it out of spite for other group participants or just to
feel "cool", and their feelings about remailers in general have nothing at
all to do with it.
A true "hater" would flood other groups, and as far as I'm aware no other
groups were flooded. Of course I just might be clueless here...??
3. I think think Eelbash Admin and Frog-Admin are two distinct persons
No doubt.
4. I think Eelbash *loves* Frog-Admin
5. I think Eelbash is Frog-Admin's 'love child' as he puts it himself
I think that's more information than I need to know. <g>
6. I think Scientology is twisted, secretive and hateful toward
remailers enough to experiment with disrupting the network
I agree with you there. I think that Scientology and Kooks like KRP are
responsible for the vast majority of random usenet abuse, and because of
that, the bulk of the bad reputation Remailers have. :(
7. I think Eelbask and Frog-Admin got something in return for the
flooding
8. http://xenu.net/archive/ot/ can save you a lot of money
9. Remember who got pissed at penet.fi (it was CoS)
Hmmm..... a link between FA and the Cult of Scientology?
Sounds like a basis for the next bockbuster SciFi movie/novel Thomas. Color
up the characters a bit, maybe make the flood a more devious attack, and
make the victim the Iraqi Embassy... you might be on to something. :)
*I* think that if the Co$ was behind some nefarious activity it wouldn't' be
limited to these groups, and they wouldn't give a rat's ass about people
like you and I who took shots at the flooders and those we thought might be
responsible. *I* think their attack would be far more broad and subtle,
like the random abuse that permeates some groups for a while, then seems to
move on once they're bloodied up enough. This is *far* more damaging to
remailers than flooding APAS and a few people who already have their minds
made up about Remailers.
Just my $.02 worth... :)
--
Hand crafted on October 20, 2005 at 19:26:32 -0400
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
-Groucho Marx
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
On 9 Nov 2005, Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
In article <ON39M7SC38664.6647337963@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Howard) wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
BTW, twisty was concerned with altering the content of mail, not the issue
of permitting floods.
No kidding? I could have sworn he blocked me because I announced I had put
in filters to block floods - nothing about altering the content of mail
Maybe twisty misunderstood what he read. Or did I phrase it confusingly?
Well, here it is again:
Agressive flood filters are in place. If you send too many messages
in too rapid succession to the same email address or newsgroup, some
of them may not make it. Sorry about that, but, the psychos have
been busy and I am sure you will understand the need to keep them
from disrupting newsgroups or preying on individuals
I don't see anything there that talks about altering the content of email,
but that's the notice that twisty reacted to.
I happen to be a close friend of twisty. You can tell by my other posts
today. Here is what my friend wrote:
Cool it. You are sounding suspiciously like a sock puppet.
I caught holy hell last night. My lips are sealed.
Howard M.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: nym DOS
On 23 Oct 2005, dhm@best.com wrote:
Who is interfering with posters who want to get nyms?
I wouldn't know. Personally, I've never had any need for
such an account. But let's hope whatever's going on with
nym accounts gets repaired soon for those who do--assuming
that there's even something awry with it in the first place?
If indeed that's the case, and nym is being DOS'd to death,
it's doubtless thanks to anti-freespeech left-wing liberal
nutjobs who HATE free speech that doesn't agree with their
failed, hopelessly irrational, politically inviable lunacy.
Look to George Soros, ACLU & the DNC for your mail-bombers.
It damn sure ain't us. The RNC loves watching you liberals
always shooting yourselves in the foot...you can't help it. :-D
Which anonymous servers here are run by police agencies?
The more the merrier. As long as it works, who cares who
runs them? That is, unless you're a criminal... are you?
Where is Frog when we need him?
I for one am very grateful for Frog's excellent contribution
to the anonymous remailer community. Many thousands of my own
humble articles and replies are permanently archived on the
Google Groups servers as well as federal government servers
which archive EVERYTHING in triplicate--even "X-No-Archive"
ad infinitum! You know, Microsoft could really give Google
a run for their money if they'd 'Freedom Of Information Act'
the fe'ral usenet archives into the public domain through MS
network servers. Are you listening, Mr. William Gates? :-D
Why are there so few recent postings in alt.anonymous.messages?
Maybe those really trying to post anonymously are using more
sophisticated methods for communicating, like embedding such
encrypted messages into JPG files of pastoral landscapes etc.?
Why is eelnym not working? I can't even get a reply about nyminfo.
Who cares if one lousy fledgling remailer sux donkey dix?
Stick to the most reliable remailers which successfully
post *your* messages to the addy's/groups *you* post to.
Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
