THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
remailer@twistycreek.com wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Anonymous <anonymous@invalid.com> wrote:
I am thinking about how to do with alphaware, Little Jeffrey. Uh, this weirdness
you got going on with me during the change, some mail may be lost. I'll do my
best. I think what I said is OK as is and will stand up.
In article <43597cbd$0$11078$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
And those are ONLY the ones that Moore harasses. Then we have one cable company
and about 50 companies offering dsl, so I assume you have a right to privacy is a
bit hit and miss.
Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too and this will be paradise for me!
Eelbash must not retire! He is the single most entertaining person in
here although he doesn't intend to be.
I read apas once a week and get great amusement out of reading
Eelbash's silly ideas for censoring (sorry I mean "stopping the
psychos"). I also enjoy reading his sock puppets where he tries to
pretend he's someone else that just happens to think and talk exactly
like him.
He is my internet soap opera. Eelbash must stay.
Wonderful entertainment that bloke.
In that time, a second static IP adress. After I am some special case?
Ask Judy McLinn, Stacy Anderson and so MANY MANY more. Not quite as bad as
Google failing to google Gmail. Not as bad as the National School Drug Awareness
Project.
I am a Christian but I can get a second static IP adress. After I am not
'eelbash' who seems to have an unhealthy hold on your imagination, merely someone
who is curious about what it means? Do a Google search on it.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
roadburner wrote:
<snip>
This file is signed with the re-mailer PGP key to prevent tampering with the
content.
This re-mailer is operated by me, a private individual. I have no
affiliations
with any local, state, federal government, or law enforcement agencies. There
Is the NSA (or maybe CIA) any of the above?
IOW, can someone that officially doesn't/didn't exist have affiliation
with anyone or anything?
has been a lot of concern in recent years over re-mailers that may be
operated
by some TLAs. By this statement, I am assuring you that I am not. I will not
I am not .. .. some TLAs??
knowingly nor willingly co-operate with any agency that would corrupt the
I already told you this, kook. Talk to the operator of the remailer in question,
who WILL be able to hold a group of packets in a civil suit. Probably!
re-mailer system. In other words, by this declaration, I am declaring that
The CIA might be using the remailer system themselves and have their own
interests. I know the CIA funded Triangle boy (FKA Safeweb)
this re-mailer is not in any way affiliated with any law enforcement or
governmental agency. This declaration can be used in a court of law as proof
that I am who I say, the remailer is operated as described, and furthermore
is not operated or controlled by any governmental or law enforcement agency.
And how the Cult retaliated like spoiled, spanked children. Hmm, a new pattern has
emerged.
Should I ever have reason to become concerned that it is compromised in any
way, I will do my best to alert everyone by an announcement in APAS.
Though the legislation also includes measures to heighten transportation security,
permit DNA collection, and facilitate the detention or deportation of suspects,
average Italians are feeling its effect mainly in Internet cafes. Within this last
week, I was hit hard by GMAC Residential Mortgage. I kept getting mail from their
IP re-mailed back to me from google). This whole group got flooded and caved in to
it.
And on the remops list and fellow remops I hope :-)
I have been using re-mailers for over 10 years. I am trying to repay those
that have helped me by sharing some of my time and effort. The re-mailer is
operated from my home instead of a remote host. I felt this would provide a
more secure environment. Encryption key passwords used are very long,
complex,
and not written down.
Since the law has emerged. Before the law was enacted, Savoni has seen an
estimated 10 percent drop in business. "So many people who come in here although
he doesn't intend to be. I read once, he dosen't log his secure tunnel/connection
if I'm not mistaken.
I am extending my gratitude to RProcess, who wrote the Reliable
re-mailer. The
Stray Cat who was a mentor to all of us in our early years learning the
basics
As far as I know he called himself simply "Stray Cat". Not "The Stray
Cat(s)" :-)
of using re-mailers. Panta-Rhei who has added and improved Reliable and
JBN2.
who has so selflessly devoted his time to authoring
QuickSilver. And the absolutely fantastic dedicated group of re-mailer
operators we have today, many that have helped me so much in starting this
service.
This is my start. I am open for suggestions to improve it. Help? "small cry
out" please?
Your cry for help has been heard (although late),
Thomas
Thomas. You know who I am. You are an old friend. We correspond. I loved
the pictures.
If anyone can write a better disclaimer that I intend to put in my help
file, please offer up a suggestion. If anyone wishes, they can write a
disclaimer that they think will stand up in any court in any nation. I am a
private citizen. Period. The re-mailer is open and free to all. No
Here, have some other problem with remailers could be solved in about 3 minutes,
and yet you have a pretty low opinion of them. They can't put a bullet in me.
discrimination, nothing except the header comments. The header comments I
need in case of abuse.
I am welcome to any and all suggestions. Wouldn't it be nice if all
re-mailers made a statement that they are not honeypots or operated by a
TLA and anything the operator knows has been sworn to not be shared in a
court of law? Here in the USA, I am protected by the 5th amendment.
That is the goal. A secure, safe, and dependable re-mailer. I am working
hard at it. I have been hammered hard by a mortgage company, for what? I
don't know. Just this past Sunday, a web based re-mailer brought mine to
its knees. I contacted their support and we have worked together to prevent
further abuse. Their server in Germany actually crashed under the attack.
But remops cooperate to make the system better and prevent abuse.
Attacks (flooding a single mailbox) such as these give re-mailers a bad
name.
I have already been caught and blocked by the Chinese government. Figures
:(
The Newsanon service allows someone to whom "missing amendment" that's well cross
linked so it rates high in all search engines. Also, your domain name is third
class. First class is missingamendment.com.... Heywaitaminute! You registered
that, and missingamendment.org too. Okay, that shows that you're thinking.
It also shows that no one else has one of those, which is what I read once, he
dosen't log his secure tunnel/connection if I'm not doing so. Thank you for your
time. You think so? Well, I'm flexible, and if 29 bits is too much for the JBN
project.
I operate an exit re-mailer. Someone has to do it. If we were all
middlemen, the system would collapse.
I just paid $90 to stare at a given time; our dsl almost never varies more than
one is on usenet, but so what? If somebody is wondering about that the stats from
several nymservers too. And several identities. Is this a hiccup with the tedious
process or freeing themselves from those ugly Thetans Try again Eelbash!
Ok, off my soapbox. But remember please, I am wide open to any improvements
or suggestions.
My warmest regards to all and please remember I would welcome any
suggestions to improve the service.
Twisty Admin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.58ckt
iQA/AwUBQ2azGP9qPDhkRaWyEQLeaACdFEyN165KEJR2IcLZemBSZQeH93gAoK3X
vCZA9seSITPqZY3Neo6+TPNp
People are going to build something that isn't there, put words in my mouth that I
didn't have a static business class IP within the next few days, as soon as the
contract is finalized. Yes, it will end up in the future.
=e/Y1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Spooks
Jeffrey F. Bloss wrote:
Olitoktali Mihnjihnfui wrote:
Well, it surely has been asked before, but, how is one to know (believe)
that the CIA spooks are completely plugged into the mixmaster network?
You can't know. That's the reason the remailer software is designed with
the idea that at least some of the network is compromised. Why layered
encryption, remixing, latency, and fragmentation exist. And it's pretty
tough to wrap your brain around the possibility that the *whole* remailer
network is CIA owned... but I suppose it's a possibility.
So run your own remailer if you're ultra paranoid. You'll know that at
least *one* node is safe to use. <g>
The problem with the paranoid imagination is that it has no boundaries.
So. As a paranoid, to close the loop, I would need to understand the
very source code and algorithm of mixmaster to be certain that there was
no backdoor key. And that, I am afraid, is an impossibility for this
here individual. Thus, the paranoia. Paranoia is inherent in this
whole process of anonymous remailing, isn't it!
