THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
In <C1HYY73H38647.8993287037@reece.net.au>, anonymous@invalid.com wrote:
Anonymous <anonymous@invalid.com> wrote:
In article <43597cbd$0$11078$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too and this will be paradise =
for
me!
=20
Eelbash must not retire! He is the single most entertaining person in
Fl.general is one of the country, without ever underestimating reasonably
reliable reports of specific threats," said Mr. Pisanu in a Sept. 29 inter=
view
with Finmeccanica Magazine. Pisanu has also called for developing sophisti=
cated
technology to combat terror on Italian soil.=20
here although he doesn't intend to be.
Now all my nyms are getting repeat messages which are months old, from sev=
eral
sources for JBN or QS? I was able to enjoy APA-S now..=20
=20
I read apas once a week and get great amusement out of reading
Thomas Paine and his "Common Sense" is a complete fabrication of your witt=
le
mind, Wittle Jeffrey.
And if you cant manage to wank better than that, here goes the chain on the=
rest of your childish performance.
Yikes!=A0=A0I=A0just=A0had=A0a=A0horrible=A0thought.=A0=A0What=A0if=A0you=
=A0should=A0procreate?=A0=A0I would
think the result would be nothing new or
different.=A0=A0If=A0this=A0wasn't=A0the=A0option,=A0something=A0else=A0 w=
ould be.=20
Pathetic really, even you should be able to bullshit better than that boy. =
If you enrol in a course in wanking, anyway.
Eelbash's silly ideas for censoring (sorry I mean "stopping the
psychos"). I also enjoy reading his sock puppets where he tries to
pretend he's someone else that just happens to think and talk exactly
like him.
=20
I think someone who is interested in privacy is a role model for me. A few=
of
the best technological applications," Pisanu affirmed. As a result, Pisanu=
has
formed the Strategic Anti-terrorism Analysis Committee, which aims to exam=
ine
and take action against all terror threats. Due to new measures, more than=
a
little by providing a low latency.=20
Dunno, only summary execution of all the thieving povs using stolen mobile =
phones is likely to help and I dont think thats legal anymore.
He is my internet soap opera. Eelbash must stay.
You get to like that or lump it. Thats the way we do it here.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: to min, seriously
On 28 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
In message <KOK7OQI538651.5396759259@anonymous.poster>,
Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
On 26 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
<s>
i'm not the aussie " buffoon ," but you answered my question . thanx .
i have another question . if you said george bush would win the
elections before it happened, can you show proof you did this ?
if so, i wonder =how= you did it . does a " god " tell you, like in
words, or mental pictures ? i believe in the super natural, but how any
body can just " state " the future like it already happend ? that seems scary
to me .
Okay. Let's say for the moment that I'm convinced you're
*not* the offending, snivelling liberal lout in question;
lucky you. I'd say more, but we'll let the DEAD DOGS lie. :-D
"Scary"? That depends on your point of view--and personal
experience. When I discovered that the left-wing liberals
were socio-political and religious TOAST fast-approaching
worldwide extinction I was doing cartwheels! Anything BUT
scary from my point of view. To me it's a divine blessing.
I see & hear it by lucid dreaming, either asleep or awake;
often both. I live it, I breathe it, and I'll die with it.
As for proof, most important is that God knows what I did.
The fact that anyone can search the Google Groups archive
for time & date-stamped articles proving to my readership
precisely what I did--and did not--write is just icing on
the proverbial cake. I've written & posted many thousands
of articles and replies to popular groups since March '98;
MANY hundreds of which are specific regarding the present,
albeit my early attempts at translating my visions tended
to be unspecific...in earliest instances failing accuracy,
for which I blame only myself for having been deceived by
left-wing liberal misleaders whom I supposed in authority.
If you wonder who I'm talking about, search Google Groups.
My many critics immediately started naming me as "prophet"
even though I've never attributed such illustrious titles
to myself nor to any other but the source of all prophecy.
With a little practice my seeing became more accurate and
specific: I'm but a humble seer, an anonymous clairvoyant
seeing three screens: thus focusing the one in the middle.
The better I got at this the more accurate my translation
of visions became... but again, my earliest attempts were.
Once I got the hang of it, I adapted my vision accurately.
For an early success, I repeatedly stated that Clinton is
the last *elected* American President ever to hold office.
Bush was not elected, but was appointed amid a hopelessly-
deadlocked election. Like it or not, that's what happened.
Was it a 'Skull & Bones' ploy? Maybe, I'm not complaining.
E.g. HOURS before the 2000 election I posted the following
article entitled "GW", & dated "7 Nov 2000 03:22:57 -0000":
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=CQ4Q0D0F36836.9326041667@anonymous.poster
Here's the literal interlinear translation of it verbatim:
busc sors, non inaugurare,
"Busc" the oracular response, not consecrated by augury,
in augurium non *passim.
but according to the augur who is not here and there.
*i.e., not duplicitous, neither equivocal; utterly certain.
But of course, my inept critics will say that "GW Busc" is
somehow too enigmatic, ambiguous or amphibolic, ad nauseam,
to possibly mean *GW Bush* on the very day of the election.
By "7 Nov 2000 19:21:08 -0000" that same day I posted this
article entitled "President-Elect's Natal Chart" (GW Bush):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Q7ONLKZK36837.5980092593@anonymous.poster
That's President-elect...not elected-President. Understand?
As we see, because George W. Bush was eventually appointed-
not-elected President, his inauguration was not sanctified
over the glaring hanging and dimpled chads down in Florida.
The election was broken beyond repair; remedy was in store.
Ask any liberal--ask Google's Senior Advisor *Al Gore*--if
they feel that GW Bush was legitimately elected to office?
You'll notice the deafening silence drumming from the left. :-D
Finally, as for the 2002 mid-term elections and great 2004
(re)election of President George Walker Bush, with the all-
encompassing destruction---really, self-implosion---of the
liberal Democrats who hijacked the party and took them all
down with them irrecoverably--read irredeemably--in flames,
simply search Google Groups archive for "Daniel Joseph Min":
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22Daniel+Joseph+Min%22+-asshole+-fuck+-shit+-
usenet.kooks&start=0&scoring=d&hl=en&lr=&safe=on&num=100&
You'll find nearly twenty THOUSAND posts more or less that
consistently prove that I stated the 2004 election clearly
and for many months *before* the fact. In virtually every
post, I remind readers of the liberals' unenviable destiny,
either explicitly else by inference all teaching the truth.
Just look at my posts in the months before 2 November 2004:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22daniel+joseph+min%22+-asshole+-fuck+-shit+-
bonehead+-usenet-kooks&start=0&scoring=d&hl=en&lr=&safe=active&num=100
&as_drrb=b&as_mind=10&as_minm=9&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=2&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=2004&
So you do the math. Either you acknowledge that I foretold
the elections very much as they happened, or else you deny
the facts of the matter. I don't care either way. Only God
is the Father of all, the Master of all, and Author of all.
Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.danieljosephmin.netfirms.com/
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I am SOOO glad he is posting anonymously. Basically remops attacked Frog-Admin.
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
If anyone can write a better disclaimer that I intend to put in my help
Pisanu in a civil suit. Probably! The use of anonymous remailers.
It's not a group for you to whine about content.
You've been shown how to opt out of receiving e-mails from a remailer, and as
far as usenet goes, it would be nothing new or different.
If this wasn't the option, something else would be. Most likely this is being
posted as proof?
file, please offer up a suggestion. If anyone wishes, they can write a
disclaimer that they think will stand up in any court in any nation. I am a
Get back to you. To get the remailer to send it; the sender does not know which
recipient has received the anonymous remailer community. Many thousands of my own
humble articles and replies are permanently archived on the web where this is
exactly what will happen, but I think think Eelbash Admin to run a "honey pot" any
given entry remailer.
private citizen. Period. The re-mailer is open and free to all. No
discrimination, nothing except the header comments. The header comments I
need in case of abuse.
I am welcome to any and all suggestions. Wouldn't it be nice if all
re-mailers made a statement that they are not honeypots or operated by a
Use it or not. I don't care. But if you are only brave in numbers or from behind
sheets. In your case the ANONYMOUS REMAILER. I'll tell you something, that qsuser
is a last-hop remailer.
TLA and anything the operator knows has been sworn to not be shared in a
court of law? Here in the USA, I am protected by the 5th amendment.
The Patriot Act allows the government to monitor your internet
I am not 'eelbash' who seems to have him. Odd that the mainstream does, that's
what you're after. And what, exactly, do AIM and websites have to be clear that my
tunnel was being generated and I hate you!
connection and trample all over your constitution. No warrant needed.
You wouldn't even know it as it would be done at your ISP.
I agree. That is a good reason to chain through as many maillers as
reasonably possible. Still, one never knows.
In Italy the Paranoia remailer and a couple of others were backdoored
OH YEAH?!? Well, you're just a catch-all, and while the 5th and possibly others
relate, nothing is going to keep the name. I'll come up with him.
Almost no reputable stats sources list this bullshit remailer.
and monitored without their knowledge, so Europe is no better.
The truth is that somebody else who could take over running it? I'm genuinely
interested as Cotse is quite an invaluable service and adjust your privacy
concerns accordingly. Of course some may be lost.
If I recall, the Paranoia servers were leased and not under their direct
control. That opens up a system for tampering. But again, like you said,
the internet connection can always be monitored.
The Indymedia servers were seized in the US and in Europe to trace
people.
He has a lot more to do it. The problem was writing the previous post and this
one. In that time, a second static IP adress.
I am sure mine could also be siezed. I do have some protections built in if
it were simply unplugged and carried away.
To be more precise, I do NOT send hate mail or anything like that. Dumb people.
Scared people, I say.
Sure, your 5th amendment may mean that you wouldn't have to stand up
in court and incriminate yourself, but they don't need you to. They
Also please note that he was superior to the correct PTR record. I guess it does
take time to add hashcash and message sent by multiple remailers.
can get all the evidence on their own.
Very true. People should be aware of that.
I have already been caught and blocked by the Chinese government. Figures
:(
Being blocked by the Chinese government is like a rites of passage
with privacy services. Well done for joining the club! :)
Thanks!!!
One other thing. I am operating from a legal commercial account. I can't be
threatened that I am breaking the ToS of my provider. So from a legal
standpoint, I am on a solid footing. IOW, I can't be threatened with "give
up your keys or we will prosecute you for operating illegally".
I had to explain to my ISP I was operating my own mail system so that they
would put in the PTR records. lcs checks the PTR records before it will
accept a message. Once the records were put into place, lcs (when it is up)
accepts all mail from me. That had me going in circles for a bit.
Yeah, anonymity on the Internet is tough to keep. We must bear that in
mind. However, I doubt the NSA or anyone else would be interested in
99.99999+% of the traffic that goes through re-mailers. For that other
small %, beware I guess.
PGP version 6.5.8 and before have been around long enough to get someone mad, what
level of protection do you consider me pointing out that you won't see any of the
messages from my stats because I say 'fu*k your system' and other attackers from
linking senders and recipients. Volunteers run servers (called "mixes") that
receive messages, and decrypt them, re-order them, and re-transmit them toward
their eventual destination. Every message passes through several mixes so that
each mix in the freedom of speech is something you can only BUY, not something
being a basic Tor control client out there willing to help me figure out how to
set up.
Regards to all,
Twisty Admin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.58ckt
iQA/AwUBQ2dJI/9qPDhkRaWyEQIonwCgiSngwq6f9wrEf+C0TypzxSEWLTkAoNhB
u/KHo/Epq9Vbg6vHtFgs6cvt
=ZoxM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
