THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
Twisty Admin <admin^@^twistycreek^.^com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:37:46 +0200, "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl>
Margen reads the state/transition file and creates a state/transition file. This
file contains information about how it in no way intended to be named.
wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Twisty Admin wrote:
He is the idea, to get a feel for the record, I did not send that and have changed
the remailer system, or with usenet distribution? I find it hard to believe that
somebody's trying to help curb abuses.
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:43:27 +0200, "Thomas J. Boschloo"
<nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
He really was a netcop and not a remop IMNSHO (even though they rhyme).
I am SOOO glad he is gone. Really glad. I can't express how much more I
am able to enjoy APA-S now.. Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too
and this will be paradise for me!
Kind Regards,
Thomas
Thanks for not including me my dear old friend. :)
So you have plans to travel the same path Frog-Admin and Eelbash do/did?
;-)
Thomas
Absolutely not ;-( Yuuuuch!!!!
Send me an E-mail smetime to chat. I am here in the US and I have never
been to your country. I would like to hear what life is like there. If I
can't see it, I would love to here about it.
Warm Regards to You,
Twisty Admin
Fl.general is one of those rumors. Yes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ1pqoo/zWl6iiTz4EQKWWQCgn8/6E14ZT7SWvh2LgV5kvQ43LHwAniqB
mqcWGo4SOZIWNvuxhqpHXuWO
=B0hI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: What Did He Do?
Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
I heard he did something pretty shabby and Frog caught him at it and let
everybody know, and SB slinked off in disgrace, and that was the reason he had it
in for Frog.
What was the shabby thing he did?
Google is your friend:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/33ebe1800ff2ecc6?hl=nl&
Basically remops attacked Frog-Admin. I attacked Frog-Admin. Champerty
attacked Frog-Admin (don't know in which particular order). Result -> I
got flooded. Champerty got flooded and caved in to it.
got flooded and killfiled me because of it (which was later rectified).
People that talked to me were flooded (like Richard Heathfield from
sci.crypt and comp.lang.c who then stopped talking to me and removed his
posts to me from google).
This whole group got flooded much worse than now by Eelbash for many
years and even when I was in a mental institution for a couple of months
the flooding continued (and I was on dail up at the time to add to
that). Then Frog-Admin announces his remailer gone and so are the floods
all of the sudden.
Then Eelbash comes (worse in some ways to Frog-Admin but less damaging
in other ways because noone takes him seriously). And then the minor
floods come.
1. I think the floods are linked to remailer load.
2. I think someone who hates remailers is behind it.
3. I think think Eelbash Admin and Frog-Admin are two distinct persons
4. I think Eelbash *loves* Frog-Admin
5. I think Eelbash is Frog-Admin's 'love child' as he puts it himself
6. I think Scientology is twisted, secretive and hateful toward
remailers enough to experiment with disrupting the network
7. I think Eelbask and Frog-Admin got something in return for the
flooding
8.
http://xenu.net/archive/ot/ can save you a lot of money
9. Remember who got pissed at penet.fi (it was CoS)
10. Love your fellow human beings and God our Lord above all :-)
hth,
Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Twistycreek re-mailer open to public
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:37:07 -0400, Twisty Admin
<admin^@^twistycreek^.^com> wrote:
And one last thing:
I went to
http://www.dnsstuff.com/ and did a search for:
brianbinder.com
No results. Can't be found. This is kind of spooky. A fake .com address?
Again, forgive me for being so paranoid. But like I said, this is the
re-mailer PC. Why would it, and it alone get targeted?
How did anyone know or find out I fixed the internal IP for the remailer at
10.1.10.200 ?
I intentionall fixed it to that internal IP so that port 25 forwarding will
always be to the re-mailer. I did this to prevent the router DHCP from
automatically giving the re-mailer an IP which would not match the IP that
is Port Forwarded.
I suppose someone could scan for an open port like 25 and then try to find
another way in.
Again, since this is the re-mailer, I really get nervous about it. People
may be trusting on its security for their own well being. That trust must
never be broken or compromised.
I have it locked down as tight as I know how to make it. As I mentioned
before, I can't even access the router from this PC. I have a KVM switch to
go to the main computer to access the router if need be. Normally, that is
the one I use anyway. I use this one for security since it is the only one
with my re-mailer PGP secret keyring on it. So I can't sign anything from
another PC.
I am wide open to suggestions. Maybe later I'll pose the question in alt.
computer.security. I think I have this locked down enough that I can devote
some time to fixing things up in the re-mailer.
But if you have a thought or a suggestion, please post it or E-mail me.
Between us all, remops and users, we have a duty to protect each other from
security compromises of any kinds.
So any volunteers that would wish to offer up suggestions are very welcome.
Regards to All,
Twisty Admin
One last note, I am signing this with one of the re-mailer keys. If you
verify the key, you will find it is signed by the re-mailer RSA key and
both Admin keys. The Admin keys are in turn signed by the re-mailer keys.
I'll try to remember to always sign my posts, but please forgive me if I
err or have to post from another PC like at my office.