THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT





Thrasher Remailer wrote:

In <435a4e91$0$11067$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, nospam@hccnet.nl wrote:

remailer@twistycreek.com wrote:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Anonymous <anonymous@invalid.com> wrote:

In article <43597cbd$0$11078$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:

Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too and this will be paradise for
me!

Eelbash must not retire! He is the single most entertaining person in
here although he doesn't intend to be.

I read apas once a week and get great amusement out of reading
Eelbash's silly ideas for censoring (sorry I mean "stopping the
psychos"). I also enjoy reading his sock puppets where he tries to
pretend he's someone else that just happens to think and talk exactly
like him.

He is my internet soap opera. Eelbash must stay.

Wonderful entertainment that bloke.

I don't think it is so wonderful. He is a PR danger to *all* remailers.
(and he knows it too)

Wrong again. You're making a VERY spectacular fool of yourself all over again.

Too stupid to even learn from the first time you did it too.

First time I said FA was a PR danger. Now I say EB is a PR danger. You
are right, I haven't learned. I still believe this..

Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Reasons to avoid Eelbash

Eelbasher <eelbasher@eelbash.yi.org> writes:

His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
The ones we know about are:


eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus
eelbash (again!)
eelbash (again!!)

Hey! My remop hero is Ms Parsifal. Quit dissing her.

Starbuck

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: to min, seriously

In article <KOK7OQI538651.5396759259@anonymous.poster>
Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

On 26 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:

    i read in some groups you post to, like here, and in the sci  hierarchy .
my question is, why don't you ever reply to  the aussie " buffoon " that stalks
you so much ?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hmmm...

Firstly, I'm not sure *why* you're inquiring?

To prove your a scumbag.