THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:
This whole group got flooded much worse than now by Eelbash for many
years and even when I was in a mental institution for a couple of months
the flooding continued (and I was on dail up at the time to add to
that). Then Frog-Admin announces his remailer gone and so are the floods
all of the sudden.
Flawed logic I think Thomas. You're suggesting Frog's demise and the end of
the flooding make the two synonymous. It's equally likely that some other
person who had an obsession with FrogAdmin simply stopped flooding when
Frog went away. There's really no way to know for sure.
Not that I'm defending anyone mind you.
Then Eelbash comes (worse in some ways to Frog-Admin but less damaging
in other ways because noone takes him seriously). And then the minor
floods come.
I'm not even sure I'd call a couple days of random text a flood, but I
suppose that's subjective.
1. I think the floods are linked to remailer load.
Lost me. ???
2. I think someone who hates remailers is behind it.
I think someone who cares little one way or the other is behind it. I think
someone is doing it out of spite for other group participants or just to
feel "cool", and their feelings about remailers in general have nothing at
all to do with it.
A true "hater" would flood other groups, and as far as I'm aware no other
groups were flooded. Of course I just might be clueless here...??
3. I think think Eelbash Admin and Frog-Admin are two distinct persons
No doubt.
4. I think Eelbash *loves* Frog-Admin
5. I think Eelbash is Frog-Admin's 'love child' as he puts it himself
I think that's more information than I need to know. <g>
6. I think Scientology is twisted, secretive and hateful toward
remailers enough to experiment with disrupting the network
I agree with you there. I think that Scientology and Kooks like KRP are
responsible for the vast majority of random usenet abuse, and because of
that, the bulk of the bad reputation Remailers have. :(
7. I think Eelbask and Frog-Admin got something in return for the
flooding
8. http://xenu.net/archive/ot/ can save you a lot of money
9. Remember who got pissed at penet.fi (it was CoS)
Hmmm..... a link between FA and the Cult of Scientology?
Sounds like a basis for the next bockbuster SciFi movie/novel Thomas. Color
up the characters a bit, maybe make the flood a more devious attack, and
make the victim the Iraqi Embassy... you might be on to something. :)
*I* think that if the Co$ was behind some nefarious activity it wouldn't' be
limited to these groups, and they wouldn't give a rat's ass about people
like you and I who took shots at the flooders and those we thought might be
responsible. *I* think their attack would be far more broad and subtle,
like the random abuse that permeates some groups for a while, then seems to
move on once they're bloodied up enough. This is *far* more damaging to
remailers than flooding APAS and a few people who already have their minds
made up about Remailers.
Just my $.02 worth... :)
--
Hand crafted on October 20, 2005 at 19:26:32 -0400
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
-Groucho Marx
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Remailer admin revealing personal info about users?
"Thrasher Remailer" <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote in message
news:7AWQCHMC38659.4619444444@reece.net.au...
The following was posted on the fl.general group. Isn't this an ethical
violation for a remailer admin to be revealing this information?
I say we boycott Eelbash. This seems to be very dishonest.
The harasser trace to a domain at XXXXXXXXXX.com. He sends one of
his spams and used my remailer as both the first and last in the chain.
The PGP key verifies to a XXXXXXXXXXXX at that domain.
Abuse is not permitted through eelbash.
Cheers!
Eelbash admin
WHAT BULLSHIT DEPARTMENT
=============================================================
Path:
nwrddc01.gnilink.net!cyclone2.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!
news.glorb.com!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news
Date: 3 Nov 2005 00:06:21 -0000
Message-ID: <UK706EHJ38659.3377430556@reece.net.au>
From: eelbash <thrasher@reece.net.au>
Subject: THE HARASSER OF YOUR NEWSGROUP CAUGHT
Newsgroups: fl.general
X-No-Archive: yes
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator... <thrasher_admin@reece.net.au>
X-Remailer-Contact: thrasher_admin@reece.net.au
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Xref: news.verizon.net fl.general:29752
X-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 19:09:20 EST (nwrddc01.gnilink.net)
The harasser trace to a domain at chicagomedialab.com. He sends one of his
spams and used my remailer as both the first and last in the chain. The
PGP key verifies to a Darrell Moore at that domain.
Abuse is not permitted through eelbash.
Cheers!
Eelbash admin
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++==
fakes
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:30:37 -0800, nonalt wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
7 years running remailers; 30 years programming while also running a
business; 3 years in the army conducting electronic warfare against the
commies. What's not to trust?
YOU. More lies. Whatever happened to the story about running remailers
for 15 years, before they even existed. Oh, wait, you were busted and
publicly branded a "LIAR". So now you bump it down to 7 years. Gotcha.
Of course I was lying about running a remailer for 15 years. I have
enough respect for the intelligence of my readers to know that they would
know there were no remailers 15 years ago; I just thought that people
would have enough of a sense of humor to get a laugh out of such a
ludicrous claim.
Even 7 years may be a bit of an exaggeration - there have been so many
remailers it's hard to remember - maybe 7 years - could be; maybe 6 -
something like that anyway.
30 years programming, yeah, right. I know for a fact where you got the
base VB module you've been dicking around with. Care to share with the
group, liar?
Sure. I programmed COBOL and a little PL-1, and even a touch of Assembler,
for 30 years, along with a couple of scripting languages - nothing like VB
(CLIST and REXX to be exact), taught myself the rudiments of visual basic
in the 1990s, and am still at the rudimentary stage.
I guess I've gone as far as I'll go with it, given my decreasing desire to
become more competent in it, let alone the actuarial tables.
By the way, 30 years ago VB did not exist, though you don't seem to have
known that.
The base VB modules you are talking about, though you don't know you are
talking about them, came from Frog Admin's site. I used them to do the
basic I/O and picked up other things from them.
The base VB module you *think* you are talking about was emailed to me by
the Dingo admin. I glanced at it, and realized it would be more work than
I wanted to do to adapt my rudimentary VB knowledge to the way Dingo admin
had coded his module (his was much superior to my klunky stuff, I might
add), so, other than glancing at it, I never used it, and have long since
discarded it.
Listen, this remailer stuff is just a hobby when you come right down to
it; don't waste your indignation on something so piddly.
I admit that's advice I also need to take on occasion, but it's much more
important for you to accept it.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: why are posts through dizum to alt.religion.kibology dropped?
Why is dizum (as exit remailer) dropping posts to
alt.religion.kibology?
Oops, I meant dingo not dizum!
Anyone know why?
