THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
PATRICK PARIS -- INTERNET FLOODING COCKSUCKER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
In article <43581217$0$11062$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
4. I think Eelbash *loves* Frog-Admin
5. I think Eelbash is Frog-Admin's 'love child' as he puts it himself
I don't remember Eelbash ever saying he was his love child, but
Joe/Eelbash-Admin obviously thinks that Frog-Admin was the ideal
remop. He liked to censor, flood, out the people that he believed to
be "psychos". Everything that Eelbash also believes in.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
Zax is not blocking any posts from being sent. He is filtering them
from his news server so that people that choose to use him to *read*
news get the clean feed.
You forget that Zax' mail2news and remailer also post through his news
server.
Now, when Frog-Admin did the same, it was bad. Right?
The messages are of course not deleted,
they're just not on his news server.
And they're not going anywhere. In fact, they are deleted.
No posts being *sent* are being blocked. His news server and his
remailer are completely different things.
That's not true. Go read some headers.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Twistycreek re-mailer open to public
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:37:07 -0400, Twisty Admin
<admin^@^twistycreek^.^com> wrote:
And one last thing:
I went to
http://www.dnsstuff.com/ and did a search for:
brianbinder.com
No results. Can't be found. This is kind of spooky. A fake .com address?
Again, forgive me for being so paranoid. But like I said, this is the
re-mailer PC. Why would it, and it alone get targeted?
How did anyone know or find out I fixed the internal IP for the remailer at
10.1.10.200 ?
I intentionall fixed it to that internal IP so that port 25 forwarding will
always be to the re-mailer. I did this to prevent the router DHCP from
automatically giving the re-mailer an IP which would not match the IP that
is Port Forwarded.
I suppose someone could scan for an open port like 25 and then try to find
another way in.
Again, since this is the re-mailer, I really get nervous about it. People
may be trusting on its security for their own well being. That trust must
never be broken or compromised.
I have it locked down as tight as I know how to make it. As I mentioned
before, I can't even access the router from this PC. I have a KVM switch to
go to the main computer to access the router if need be. Normally, that is
the one I use anyway. I use this one for security since it is the only one
with my re-mailer PGP secret keyring on it. So I can't sign anything from
another PC.
I am wide open to suggestions. Maybe later I'll pose the question in alt.
computer.security. I think I have this locked down enough that I can devote
some time to fixing things up in the re-mailer.
But if you have a thought or a suggestion, please post it or E-mail me.
Between us all, remops and users, we have a duty to protect each other from
security compromises of any kinds.
So any volunteers that would wish to offer up suggestions are very welcome.
Regards to All,
Twisty Admin
One last note, I am signing this with one of the re-mailer keys. If you
verify the key, you will find it is signed by the re-mailer RSA key and
both Admin keys. The Admin keys are in turn signed by the re-mailer keys.
I'll try to remember to always sign my posts, but please forgive me if I
err or have to post from another PC like at my office.
