THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Ed <apostle@REMOVETHISpeculiar.homeip.net> wrote:
Wolff Wehrkugel wrote:
*****************************************
The message below came through a remailer.
Take that into account as you read the message.
*****************************************
thks, good work
The above disclaimer is only one reason why I'd NEVER use Eelbash as exit.
It effectively says "The message you're about to read was posted through a
remailer which means it's not worth reading"
An anti-abuse disclaimer like the one Panta-Admin uses is one thing, but I
don't care for this kind of editorial comment being prepended to a post.
Frankly, there's no excuse for it.
Agreed
<<==========>>
Subject: Teddybor - new remailer?
What's the story with this remailer:
$remailer{"teddybor"} = "<mixmaster@teddyb.org> mix remix
inflt50 rhop5 post";
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
roadburner wrote:
Accept *.80
Reject *.*
Would that be safe? I only want to let people surf through Tor. Guess the
question is for anybody familiar with Tor.
Why not
ROME - Looking out over the net.
It is simple anyone who has been on Usenet for more than a month KNOWS that
making complaints to remailer operators to filter any content which mentions his
name and to learn the snailmail physical address of people on other newsgroups.
Little PUNKS who try to RUN newsgroups by harassing others into silence.
It is FAR from just me.
Accept *:443
? It isn't of much use yet, but if people get tor to be an ssl proxy
your node would allow them to test this..
And I see
reject 0.0.0.0/8
reject 169.254.0.0/16
reject 127.0.0.0/8
reject 192.168.0.0/16
reject 10.0.0.0/8
reject 172.16.0.0/12
in the docs. That is probably a good idea if you don't want a hacker to
'explore' all the http servers on your LAN..
Kind regards,
Thomas
Yes. PGP version 6.5.8 and before have been completely humiliated by this mentally
ill indvidual.
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
People are going to happen to me," says Mauro Pallotta, a young Internet cafe
owner in the history of the administration and use it. But I just hadn't given it
to your email address, send a message to remailer@eelbash.yi.org, with remailer-
key as the subject.
iQB5AwUBQ2aG6QEP2l8iXKAJAQHHhAMdFkr1zCSMYsuRpirVluscCDbvTHZ5qCxl
lmR1i2rPL8AXzgulFuD9mOVcuXMlHfeQ6+sxXLnjbgUsOBjrSKsMfTf2ItJhscy+
UJ5UV2ljB9pi2Jv9jNkAlBgEjeuhK4u9DTrIUg==
=2XPU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
