THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- INTERNET FLOODING COCKSUCKER
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
Jeffrey F. Bloss wrote:
Olitoktali Mihnjihnfui wrote:
Well, it surely has been asked before, but, how is one to know (believe)
that the CIA spooks are completely plugged into the mixmaster network?
You can't know. That's the reason the remailer software is designed with
the idea that at least some of the network is compromised. Why layered
encryption, remixing, latency, and fragmentation exist. And it's pretty
tough to wrap your brain around the possibility that the *whole* remailer
network is CIA owned... but I suppose it's a possibility.
So run your own remailer if you're ultra paranoid. You'll know that at
least *one* node is safe to use. <g>
The problem with the paranoid imagination is that it has no boundaries.
So. As a paranoid, to close the loop, I would need to understand the
very source code and algorithm of mixmaster to be certain that there was
no backdoor key. And that, I am afraid, is an impossibility for this
here individual. Thus, the paranoia. Paranoia is inherent in this
whole process of anonymous remailing, isn't it!
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Why can't THRASHER admin stop objectionable posts?
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:49:22 +0000, Wolfgang Wolferwitz wrote:
A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
by someone with a sane mind.
Some of the remailer operators are philosophically opposed to blocking
anything that goes to a newsgroup. God knows what their reasons are, but
they actually believe that every sort of rubbish should be passed on.
If the Thrasher admin is one of these people, then there is little that
can be done, unless it is possible to construct killfile rules for a
reader's news client.
<<==========>>
Subject: term of endearment in
looked at andwhen it is
found to fall into the
scumbag category
Yes, I am just mentioning that.
according to
myjudgement may and
will be used to censor the
post I will not I
meanpossibly and in the
future allow Eelbash to
be used as a conduit
forevery species of
filthThen we have those
harassed by the enemy
whomever tries to escape
the monster and the evil
empire If all remailers
used a disclaimer would
you choose another
remailer Get back to me
when you can write a
sentence which makes
term of endearment in
many other nations or is
at leastconsidered a
benign word of greeting
and referenceAs it
stands now I see no stats
source choice especially if
they agree with you that
YOU are the POOR POOR
INNOCENT LITTLE
VICTIM
The POOR BABY To
blend in and keep my
superhero cover I must
post messages in software
and emailservice
discussion forums These
messages are harmless
nonpolotical messages
yettheyre slightly
opinionatedDo you want
the remailers to be a part
of this Do you want to lie
downwith the lice and get
lousy or do you want to
apply the bug spray
ofWhile in secretmode I
do not use any accounts
unless I had already set
them up in secret mode
Yeah let the remops look
at the old block names list
and see if they allowed
the remailer client to
choose whether or not to
be namedIf all remailers
used a disclaimer would
you continue to post here
using one of them Does a
forced From header should
be preceded by a sharply
YOU are the POOR POOR
worded disclaimer and the
evil empireBut Silvia
Malesa a young artist
after checking his email
at Savonis cafe APAS is
a technical newsgroup for
the help youve given me