THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER




Jeffrey F. Bloss wrote:

Olitoktali Mihnjihnfui wrote:

Well, it surely has been asked before, but, how is one to know (believe)
 that the CIA spooks are completely plugged into the mixmaster network?

You can't know. That's the reason the remailer software is designed with
the idea that at least some of the network is compromised. Why layered
encryption, remixing, latency, and fragmentation exist. And it's pretty
tough to wrap your brain around the possibility that the *whole* remailer
network is CIA owned... but I suppose it's a possibility.

So run your own remailer if you're ultra paranoid. You'll know that at
least *one* node is safe to use. <g>

The problem with the paranoid imagination is that it has no boundaries.
   So. As a paranoid, to close the loop, I would need to understand the
very source code and algorithm of mixmaster to be certain that there was
no backdoor key.  And that, I am afraid, is an impossibility for this
here individual.  Thus, the paranoia.  Paranoia is inherent in this
whole process of anonymous remailing, isn't it!

<<==========>>

Subject: Zv5 Ybirf R,R'Y.O@$U


ufnoyrR ribY fertabzufvS

EelbashR

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Why can't THRASHER admin stop objectionable posts?

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:49:22 +0000, Wolfgang Wolferwitz wrote:

A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
by someone with a sane mind.

Some of the remailer operators are philosophically opposed to blocking
anything that goes to a newsgroup.  God knows what their reasons are, but
they actually believe that every sort of rubbish should be passed on.

If the Thrasher admin is one of these people, then there is little that
can be done, unless it is possible to construct killfile rules for a
reader's news client.