THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- THE HUMAN MAGGOT
PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR




Jeffrey F. Bloss wrote:

Olitoktali Mihnjihnfui wrote:

Well, it surely has been asked before, but, how is one to know (believe)
 that the CIA spooks are completely plugged into the mixmaster network?

You can't know. That's the reason the remailer software is designed with
the idea that at least some of the network is compromised. Why layered
encryption, remixing, latency, and fragmentation exist. And it's pretty
tough to wrap your brain around the possibility that the *whole* remailer
network is CIA owned... but I suppose it's a possibility.

So run your own remailer if you're ultra paranoid. You'll know that at
least *one* node is safe to use. <g>

The problem with the paranoid imagination is that it has no boundaries.
   So. As a paranoid, to close the loop, I would need to understand the
very source code and algorithm of mixmaster to be certain that there was
no backdoor key.  And that, I am afraid, is an impossibility for this
here individual.  Thus, the paranoia.  Paranoia is inherent in this
whole process of anonymous remailing, isn't it!

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Moron flooder  "eelbash"  was "Frog"


Dermott McDermott wrote:

Somebody named Secure Beer has been mentioned as the floodr or at least one of

the biggest flooders. I am not sure of his reason for flooding if he is the
flooder, but something about wanting to make the remailer system his way and being
blocked by frog admin? I mean frog admin found him flooding or something from the
headers of his messages. And since then this Secure Beer has been having an
unending hissy fit and floods and so on, sort of like a baby stamping his foot.

I like Secure Beer. And under the monker of Champerty he was subjected
to floods himself IIRC. And he wrote a FAQ (so flooding would not be his
style). The floods also attacked me and Champerty at first (mainly me at
the end of it), but that doesn't clear him just like the floods being
pro Frog-Admin doesn't clear that man either.

Whatever it is, it is decremental to the status remailer users have on
usenet.

Remops where never liked by the majority of internet users IMHO.

If that is correct why do you think it is? Is it that the majority of internet

users do not see the importance of Freedom of Speech the way remops do?

Remops are seen as facilitators and defenders of abuse by many usenet
readers. Just post anonymously to a group besides APA-S or ASP and you
will see this (unless they don't know what remailers are yet).

Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again

Zax <fleegle@bananasplit.info> wrote:

This is an example where banana does act as an exit and is subject to
local news filters.  Then again, it takes a concious effort on the users
part to hardcode banana as the exit node, it would never be randomly
selected.

WRONG AGAIN ZAX!

That's why middlemen remailers randhop messages to exit remailers.
BECAUSE CLIENTS DO CHOOSE MIDDLEMAN REMAILERS RANDOMLY EVEN AS EXIT NODE!

Get a clue!

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente   |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore   |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni      |For more info
                  https://www.mixmaster.it