THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
nonalt wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
<nobody@cypherpunks.to> wrote:
In article <UD9P7ZXE38646.2953356481@remailer@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote:
Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?
CNN
Such uninformed BS could only come from a Foxnews watcher.
Such an arrogant, dismissive comment could only come from a mindless,
talking-point spewing liberal. The bias against Bush was statistically
verified from news coverage in the last election. More than 85% of
journalists are *self described* as "Democrats". More than 85%.
And 90% of them are right handed! So what is the correlation? Maybe
Democrats are better Journalists. There is no law that states everything
should be 50-50, does it? The whole concept of a two party system is
flawed anyways. I am glad I don't live in the US for this reason. We
have about nine real parties in Holland atm
http://www.parlement.com/9291000/modules/gopgahm7 not perfect, but far
superior imho
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: More Reasons To Avoid Eelbash
On 23 Oct 2005, Wolff Wehrkugel <wehrkugel@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
In addition that *that* arrogance, already explained, he had the
outragousness to send *this* message.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Anonymous Sender <anonym...@remailer.metacolo.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2004, <admin@[CENSORED].dynu.com> wrote:
You are afflicted with [SOD OFF]ing self-[BLOCKED]ness. How long before you
filter out discussions of [WRONG SPEECH]? [BAD THOUGHT]? [SOD OFF]?
[BANNED]? What else is
"[FLAKE OFF] in civilized discourse" in [FORGET IT]'s [HATE THOUGHT]
little world of
[NICHEVO]ing [VERBOTEN] [NO WAY]ness?
I would defend to the death your right to express your opinion.
Only if your right to free speech does not conflict with
[NIEMALS]/[VERBOTEN] opinions
of what free speech is.
Not at all: the Congo Remailer is open to all opinions, the more diverse,
the better. I treat all messages like the Crown Jewels, faithfully
transmitting them, with due care to obscure any information about the
origin of the message.
[CENSORED]/[NO WAY] = The Net [SOD OFF]
Congo = The Civil Remailer.
[In the interests of promoting civility,
one or more crude expressions have been replaced
with a stamp, in brackets, to symbolize their
unacceptability in civilized discourse]
Wonder what happens?
fuck
shit
crap
Eeelbash
asshole
dickhead
penis
fuckhead
dumbass
asswipe
butthead
braindead
cock
cocksucker
pussy
pussylicker
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Proof inside that claiming "no logs" is bullshit!
Snake Charmer <privacy.LIE.suks@all.day> wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
"Hello, I am the owner of privacy.li. Today i saw some extra visitors, so
i checked where they came from and arrived here."
http://www.privacy.li/forum/viewtopic.php?t=308
No logs, huh? Then how did you know there were "extra visitors" and where
they came from. No logs=Bullshit! You quite obviously log or you would
have absolutely now way to know any of this!
Not only a liar, but a STUPID liar. Notice how all the socks have avoided
this like the plague? Where's their big mouths NOW?
ROTFL!
How can ANYBODY still defend privacy.LIE? It's impossible to look at them
without laughing. Or CRYING if you're one of their suckers, errr, customers.
All the lies they've been caught in, the bank scam, the way Adminus behaves
here, and the LONG history of fraud and lies make them the LAUGHING STOCK
of the privacy community.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
But I don't care. I don't care.
