THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- THE HUMAN MAGGOT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Message-type: plaintext
In <5GUFRBB938649.0535300926@reece.net.au> Thrasher Remailer
<thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, nonalt <nonalt@hod.aarg.net> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
<nobody@cypherpunks.to> wrote:
In article <UD9P7ZXE38646.2953356481@remailer@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote:
Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?
CNN
Such uninformed BS could only come from a Foxnews watcher.
Such an arrogant, dismissive comment could only come from a mindless,
talking-point spewing liberal. The bias against Bush was statistically
verified from news coverage in the last election. More than 85% of
journalists are *self described* as "Democrats". More than 85%.
They say what they're paid to say by the people who OWN the
media you dumb shit.
Are you so stupid you think the talking heads write the drivel they
read off the teleprompter?
'cause i don't wanna be stupid.
Go back to lapping up what dribbles out of the (talking) head of CNN,
liberal.
Go back to sucking down whatever spurts out of the cock of Satan,
you Nazi shit.
-----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: What Did He Do?
Pit Digger wrote:
I stopped using Frog when I realized what his headers contained about
abuse. I don't remember exactly what they were but they had someone's
e-mail in them. I would never promote such a ridiculous notion. Frog turned
out to be a bit too pompous for me. I think headers like his were a
disrespect for all remops. If :) I ever ran a re-mailer, I would never
See
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/ad089602f5fa95f0
and
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/edaac4fefa8ed23f
He really was a netcop and not a remop IMNSHO (even though they rhyme).
I am SOOO glad he is gone. Really glad. I can't express how much more I
am able to enjoy APA-S now.. Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too
and this will be paradise for me!
Kind Regards,
Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: PGP 8.1 for Windows & Mac
Thrasher Remailer wrote:
In <141487877198371.PGP@version.81>, PGP@version.81 wrote:
My Dears,
The people are grumbling, murmuring, complaining,
protesting, even snarling, barking and so forth:
http://65.24.76.65/sounds/FX/bark1.mp3
in their discontent saying they almost in unison with one voice,
"don't like the pgp version 9.x"
Of course. 7.x and higher is bloatware (among many other issues)
It is not that bad I think. And PGP 9.0.2 is supposedly very easy to use
(once you pay to use the local mail proxy).
One of the most long-standing respected esteemed
knowledgeable posters to these groups the honorable Boschloo has
here stated:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/5d250863b0e5bec6
"if you are going to use PGP you would be best of using version
8.1"
Mr Boschloo is incorrect.
Untill we see a newer version of spgp.dll, pgp 6.5.8ckt09b3 is the highest
version welcome. It would be best if spgp.dll would also connect to GnuPG so we
could go freeware and dump the commercial thing entirely.
Spoken like a true JBNx user :-)
Note, 8.10 is the best you can use with QS
PGP 6.5.9ckt08 is the last non-beta for use with JBN2, see Imad in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.pgp/msg/8dc6b3b702208cde?dmode=source
Happy regards,
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
