THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING




Ed wrote:

Can Reliable, JBN and / 0r Quicksilver be run in Linux with wine?

I dont think so. I have been myself looking for a good linux
gui-frontend to mixmaster, but no such program exists -in the pubic
domain at least.

i had to partition my drive so i can have some windows programs at least..

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Why can't THRASHER admin stop objectionable posts?

Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:49:22 +0000, Wolfgang Wolferwitz wrote:

A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
by someone with a sane mind.

Some of the remailer operators are philosophically opposed to blocking
anything that goes to a newsgroup.  God knows what their reasons are, but
they actually believe that every sort of rubbish should be passed on.

What do you think should be passed on?
Only things that you agree with, right?

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Serious question, related to this "Pangborn" stuff

AD wrote:

"Jeffrey F. Bloss" <jbloss@tampabay.mapson.rr.com> wrote:

^  krp ! wrote:

    Sounds like RATIONALIZATION............... *I* have NEVER NEVER
    NEVER
NEVER NEVER NEVER used a remailer. GOT IT MORON? NEVER!
I do NOT have the anonymizing software on my computers. PERIOD!

Message-ID: <TNK938ME38419.5208101852@reece.net.au>
Message-ID: <tjhXd.77945$Dc.44771@trnddc06>

The same message posted first through a remailer, then through your own
account.

In regard to the message IDs mentioned above, which are also mentioned on
the page www.aboutkenpangborn.com/altatheism.html.  To me this seems to
indicate that Kenny is guilty of the very offenses which he accuses others
of:  forging and harassing through the remailers. The message posted
through the remailer looks like it was a forgery of someone else in
another group, and the fact that Kenny a short while later sent the exact
same text
from his known address makes it indeed seem that he was the forger.  Could
I be interpreting this wrong?

If he indeed is the sender, then it would seem he is delibarately abusing
remailers so that he can have more ammunition in his arguments here in
APAS.  I am curious to know how others may interpret these facts.

The term 'net-kook' comes quickly to mind