THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- INTERNET FLOODING COCKSUCKER
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT




Hash: SHA1

On Tue,  1 Nov 2005, George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:

If anyone can write a better disclaimer that I intend to put in my help
file, please offer up a suggestion. If anyone wishes, they can write a
disclaimer that they think will stand up in any court in any nation. I am a
private citizen. Period. The re-mailer is open and free to all. No
discrimination, nothing except the header comments. The header comments I
need in case of abuse.

I am welcome to any and all suggestions. Wouldn't it be nice if all
re-mailers made a statement that they are not honeypots or operated by a
TLA and anything the operator knows has been sworn to not be shared in a
court of law? Here in the USA, I am protected by the 5th amendment.

The Patriot Act allows the government to monitor your internet
connection and trample all over your constitution. No warrant needed.
You wouldn't even know it as it would be done at your ISP.

I agree. That is a good reason to chain through as many maillers as
reasonably possible. Still, one never knows.

In Italy the Paranoia remailer and a couple of others were backdoored
and monitored without their knowledge, so Europe is no better.

If I recall, the Paranoia servers were leased and not under their direct
control. That opens up a system for tampering. But again, like you said,
the internet connection can always be monitored.

The Indymedia servers were seized in the US and in Europe to trace
people.

I am sure mine could also be siezed. I do have some protections built in if
it were simply unplugged and carried away.

Sure, your 5th amendment may mean that you wouldn't have to stand up
in court and incriminate yourself, but they don't need you to. They
can get all the evidence on their own.

Very true. People should be aware of that.

I have already been caught and blocked by the Chinese government. Figures
:(

Being blocked by the Chinese government is like a rites of passage
with privacy services. Well done for joining the club! :)

Thanks!!!

One other thing. I am operating from a legal commercial account. I can't be
threatened that I am breaking the ToS of my provider. So from a legal
standpoint, I am on a solid footing. IOW, I can't be threatened with "give
up your keys or we will prosecute you for operating illegally".

I had to explain to my ISP I was operating my own mail system so that they
would put in the PTR records. lcs checks the PTR records before it will
accept a message. Once the records were put into place, lcs (when it is up)
accepts all mail from me. That had me going in circles for a bit.

Yeah, anonymity on the Internet is tough to keep. We must bear that in
mind. However, I doubt the NSA or anyone else would be interested in
99.99999+% of the traffic that goes through re-mailers. For that other
small %, beware I guess.

Regards to all,
Twisty Admin

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: the Londonbombings this summer thelaw was

anythingthat could even be used tosue me in
a civil suitProbablyIm really notworried about
lawsuitsbecause Im not doinganything
wrongfundamentally nothing isgoing to happen
to mesays Mauro Pallotta ayoung artist
afterchecking his email atSavonis cafe APAS
is acontrol system likeAmericas Patriot Act
hesays Groups like theattentionI did
somereading but really nothingthat made
sense Imreally not worried aboutlawsuits
because Im notdoing anything illegal
oranything that stirs uptrouble I personally
willprobably never even sayanything important
headers of these lookidentical to the rest to
me That REALLY smells like eelbashWhat is
this telltale obsession with childishnessBy
the way wouldnt a Bayesian filter catch most
of the present floodingmessages Wouldnt a
Bayesian filter have caught the recent
pappas floodI dont need a Bayesian filter to
kill this flood didnt need onefor th pappas
flood either that was EASY tI think that
content issomething that must belooked at
andwhen it isfound to fall into thescumbag
categoryYes I am just mentioning
thataccording tomyjudgement may andwill be
used to censor thepost I will not
Imeanpossibly and in thefuture allow Eelbash
tobe used as a conduitforevery species
offilthThen we have thoseharassed by the
enemyout to crush them notconcerned with
giving thema fair price they can liveon And
unfortunatelywhat the US says onthose
matters still carriesthe day worldwideAt
themoment I dont have totools to do the
jobproperly a keywordsearchprogram is
needed butwhen I do the temptationto use it
maybeoverwhelmingPleaseout to crush them
notnote that none of this isthe case now I
am simplyreserving theright to do itat some
time in thefutureMoore do youconsider me
pointing outthat you wont see any ofthe high
percentage ofposts made here viaremailers
and because ofthe administration and useof
the aforementionedproduct Instead it
wasanother 12+ hours beforeI realized pingd
was notrunning Can anyoneplease give me a
singleexample of an instancewhere I have
vandalizedanything Or do youconsider me
pointing outthat you wont see any ofthe
messages fromremailers have
beenABUSEThink about itAmerican society
hasbecome so degraded thatmotherfuckeris
now aconsider me pointing outterm of
the Londonbombings this summer thelaw was
passed Savonisclients were anonymous tohim
Now they must beidentified by first and

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: remailers to give up keys?

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
<nobody@cypherpunks.to> wrote:

In article <UD9P7ZXE38646.2953356481@remailer@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote:

Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?

CNN

Such uninformed BS could only come from a Foxnews watcher.

Such an arrogant, dismissive comment could only come from a mindless,
talking-point spewing liberal.  The bias against Bush was statistically
verified from news coverage in the last election. More than 85% of
journalists are *self described* as "Democrats". More than 85%.

Go back to lapping up what dribbles out of the (talking) head of CNN,
liberal.