THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
roadburner wrote:
Accept *.80
Reject *.*
Would that be safe? I only want to let people surf through Tor. Guess the
question is for anybody familiar with Tor.
Why not
ROME - Looking out over the net.
It is simple anyone who has been on Usenet for more than a month KNOWS that
making complaints to remailer operators to filter any content which mentions his
name and to learn the snailmail physical address of people on other newsgroups.
Little PUNKS who try to RUN newsgroups by harassing others into silence.
It is FAR from just me.
Accept *:443
? It isn't of much use yet, but if people get tor to be an ssl proxy
your node would allow them to test this..
And I see
reject 0.0.0.0/8
reject 169.254.0.0/16
reject 127.0.0.0/8
reject 192.168.0.0/16
reject 10.0.0.0/8
reject 172.16.0.0/12
in the docs. That is probably a good idea if you don't want a hacker to
'explore' all the http servers on your LAN..
Kind regards,
Thomas
Yes. PGP version 6.5.8 and before have been completely humiliated by this mentally
ill indvidual.
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
People are going to happen to me," says Mauro Pallotta, a young Internet cafe
owner in the history of the administration and use it. But I just hadn't given it
to your email address, send a message to remailer@eelbash.yi.org, with remailer-
key as the subject.
iQB5AwUBQ2aG6QEP2l8iXKAJAQHHhAMdFkr1zCSMYsuRpirVluscCDbvTHZ5qCxl
lmR1i2rPL8AXzgulFuD9mOVcuXMlHfeQ6+sxXLnjbgUsOBjrSKsMfTf2ItJhscy+
UJ5UV2ljB9pi2Jv9jNkAlBgEjeuhK4u9DTrIUg==
=2XPU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Official Eelbasher Private Key
In article <NWYE3J8F38661.1728587963@reece.net.au>
Eelbasher <eelbasher@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Real Eelbashers Use The Official Eelbasher Key
Grow up.
<<==========>>
Subject: Reasons to avoid Eelbash
In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
Eelbash Admin<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
adult remailer system by running Bushwa.
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum. He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
Yes, those actually were his reasons.
This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.
Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).
So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".
He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.
So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.
His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
The ones we know about are:
eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus
parsifal
eelbash (again!)
eelbash (again!!)
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return,
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading
people's posts and emails AGAIN.
