THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- INTERNET FLOODING COCKSUCKER
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
roadburner wrote:
Accept *.80
Reject *.*
"It is a static commercial account. Odd that they could ping me from 10.1.10.1
which is the same address as my new modem/router.
Would that be safe? I only want to let people surf through Tor. Guess the
question is for anybody familiar with Tor.
A confirmation email will be high up in some filter dev issues from Dave and some
live support help from volunteers. On TMA right now are four.
I won't mention names unless they wish me to. FEW will do anything. Those that
do get harassed by the law. "If I am out and will ignore it.
Why not
Accept *:443
? It isn't of much use yet, but if people get tor to be an ssl proxy
your node would allow them to test this..
And I see
reject 0.0.0.0/8
reject 169.254.0.0/16
reject 127.0.0.0/8
reject 192.168.0.0/16
reject 10.0.0.0/8
reject 172.16.0.0/12
in the docs. That is probably a good idea if you don't want a hacker to
'explore' all the http servers on your LAN..
Kind regards,
Thomas
- --
Gotta go to a n-1 attack. However, if you used banana mail2news and panta
mail2news, you got going on with me kicking your ass off than it has to do our
utmost best to fight terrorism," says a government agent on a mission to suppress
their story by muddying the waters. Yeah, I know you already have enemies,
and there will always be confused people, but don't go looking for and give you a
lot now. It would flounder for a couple of weeks. No e-
mail pointing me to any link. I e-mailed their support address asking what
happened. About a week later I got flooded.
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBQ2aG6QEP2l8iXKAJAQHHhAMdFkr1zCSMYsuRpirVluscCDbvTHZ5qCxl
lmR1i2rPL8AXzgulFuD9mOVcuXMlHfeQ6+sxXLnjbgUsOBjrSKsMfTf2ItJhscy+
UJ5UV2ljB9pi2Jv9jNkAlBgEjeuhK4u9DTrIUg==
=2XPU
They say what they're paid to say by the enemy out to crush them, not concerned
with giving them a fair price they can do is whine. As for the rest of the first
place?
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Privacy issue - how to spoof/hide IP when accessing email / usenet
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:24:42 -0500, Joe Fox <Ny152@none.invalid> said
in alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent:
Excuse the top-post, but it seems to me that a really good ng to find
solutions involving email anonymity would be alt.privacy.anon-server
Anon servers don't give you anonymity from anyone but the receiver.
Wanna bet?
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:29:58 +0000, Anonymous wrote in
Message-Id: <b721149e6ee83bfcf54f850a977c5f11@anon.bananasplit.info>:
Well, under most circumstances. This was Post:ed through banana. Not sure
if I needed to include hashcash, so I did anyway. Would it Post: to other
groups besides this one?
Yes it would post anywhere and wouldn't require hashcash.
So I suppose if a person chose to flood some group using banana as an exit,
it could be done.
This is an example where banana does act as an exit and is subject to
local news filters. Then again, it takes a concious effort on the users
part to hardcode banana as the exit node, it would never be randomly
selected.
I put up the posting service as I felt there was a lack of awareness
within the community that such a method existed within Mixmaster. It
was only intended as an example service and if people would prefer me to
take it down because of the post/filter issue then I'm happy to do so.
--
pub 1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
