THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
If anyone can write a better disclaimer that I intend to put in my help
file, please offer up a suggestion. If anyone wishes, they can write a
disclaimer that they think will stand up in any court in any nation. I am a
private citizen. Period. The re-mailer is open and free to all. No
discrimination, nothing except the header comments. The header comments I
need in case of abuse.
I am welcome to any and all suggestions. Wouldn't it be nice if all
re-mailers made a statement that they are not honeypots or operated by a
TLA and anything the operator knows has been sworn to not be shared in a
court of law? Here in the USA, I am protected by the 5th amendment.
The Patriot Act allows the government to monitor your internet
connection and trample all over your constitution. No warrant needed.
You wouldn't even know it as it would be done at your ISP.
I agree. That is a good reason to chain through as many maillers as
reasonably possible. Still, one never knows.
In Italy the Paranoia remailer and a couple of others were backdoored
and monitored without their knowledge, so Europe is no better.
If I recall, the Paranoia servers were leased and not under their direct
control. That opens up a system for tampering. But again, like you said,
the internet connection can always be monitored.
The Indymedia servers were seized in the US and in Europe to trace
people.
I am sure mine could also be siezed. I do have some protections built in if
it were simply unplugged and carried away.
Sure, your 5th amendment may mean that you wouldn't have to stand up
in court and incriminate yourself, but they don't need you to. They
can get all the evidence on their own.
Very true. People should be aware of that.
I have already been caught and blocked by the Chinese government. Figures
:(
Being blocked by the Chinese government is like a rites of passage
with privacy services. Well done for joining the club! :)
Thanks!!!
One other thing. I am operating from a legal commercial account. I can't be
threatened that I am breaking the ToS of my provider. So from a legal
standpoint, I am on a solid footing. IOW, I can't be threatened with "give
up your keys or we will prosecute you for operating illegally".
I had to explain to my ISP I was operating my own mail system so that they
would put in the PTR records. lcs checks the PTR records before it will
accept a message. Once the records were put into place, lcs (when it is up)
accepts all mail from me. That had me going in circles for a bit.
Yeah, anonymity on the Internet is tough to keep. We must bear that in
mind. However, I doubt the NSA or anyone else would be interested in
99.99999+% of the traffic that goes through re-mailers. For that other
small %, beware I guess.
Regards to all,
Twisty Admin
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Please Block The Flood
CLEARLY, THE PURPOSE for flooders, trolls, DOS attackers, etc.
is to compromise anonymous remailers every way they can. They
employ every dishonest methodology known to mass-propagandists
since time immemorial: disinformation, obfuscation, diversion,
threats, attacks on your enablers (flooding ISPs with threats,
for example), and all manner of frivolous innuendo ad nauseam.
The reason flooders/trollers don't like remailers is that they
don't like free speech *unless* it happens to agree with their
irresponsible, far-left radical liberal anarchistic party line.
They hate honesty; and therefore, they hate honest free speech.
It's that simple. Truth & Law is every anarchist's worst enemy.
For example, those of us who consistently support conservative
values are constantly being attacked by these left-wing idiots,
to the point that we MUST post through the remailers to thwart
their concerted attacks against our ISPs and/or unique servers,
the latter of which describes a big problem with remailer floods.
The mere fact that YOU are posting in support of their radical
agenda demonstrates that *you* are among the flooders! Whereas
by contrast, every honest remailer user (contrast to ab-users)
knows to use his/her own customized levels of filtering on his
end. Judicious use of multi-layered headers and context kill-
filtering (e.g. Xnews, Nfilter, Hamster, as I use effectively)
is sufficient to eliminate >98% of all deceitful garbage from
cluttering your computer screen--if that's what you're after. :-D
Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
"n...@...t" trolled in vain:
<snipped for clarity>
"There's nothing like a good, clean kill!"
--Peter Sellers, 'The Magic Christian'
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: What Did He Do?
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Anonymous <anonymous@invalid.com> wrote:
In article <20051020174227.2806917093@mail.cypherpunks.to>
Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer <nobody@cypherpunks.to> wrote:
It's surprising to see such venom in reply to a simple question. Are
you sure you are not Secure Beer?
I dont think it was Frogs word for whatever it was that SB did. I
seem to recall several people on the group agreeing that SB had done
something not quite kosher.
I am just curious about what it was.
Wait. Are you Bluejay???
If he was Bluejay he'd have gone into a misinformed rant about how
homosexuals are responsible for global warming or something.
Eelbash if you want to attempt to blacken Secure Beer's name, I
suggest you come up with something better than "I seem to recall
several people said he did something bad".
Secure Beer blackened his own name. He does not need eelbash's help for
that.
