THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING





On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, admin_rbtor <admin^@^rbtor^.^net> wrote:

On 12 Oct 2005 23:54:40 -0000, Dingo Admin <dingoadmin@dingoremailer.com>
wrote:

On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, admin_rbtor <admin^@^rbtor^.^net> wrote:

Ok, so I got into trouble with my ISP for operating a re-mailer. They
consider
it a server which is outside of the TOS of the agreement.

I'm sorry to hear this. You have been an asset to the network.

Dingo Admin
dingoadmin@dingoremailer.com

Dear Dingo

When I come back on line, I'll ask you first to list me in your stats. I hope
you will do me the honor. I have trusted you for years. That trust remains
unbroken with me.

Over the years I have found you cautious and trustworthy. I may come back
under a different name, but I hope you will consider me.

Your pages are still in my stats for JBN as they have been since 4 to 5 years
ago. I enjoyed your webpage on the evolution of Dingo. I got a kick out of the
hotpop problems. (sorry) I know you were trying hard. I also noticed you moved
up in the world from Mercury. Any reason why?

I was trying to speed things up so I could handle some flooding that was
going on at the time. I was also trying to figure out how to implement TLS
on a Windows system. MDaemon offered a very solid program, TLS, and someone
I could complain to if it didn't work right.

It's not free, but it's also not too terribly expensive, either. It does a
good job, and I've been very happy with it. I would recommend it if you
were looking for a low cost alternative to Mercury.

Trust!!!! Period. You have earned it.

My warmest regards to you in particular,
You will always remain a most trusted source.

admin_rbtor

Thanks! It's very nice to hear that!

Dingo Admin
dingoadmin@dingoremailer.com

<<==========>>

Subject: Tlas love eelbash


cia loves E,e'l.b@$h

Eelbasher

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: RSA-640 Factored


Jeffrey F. Bloss wrote:

I wouldn't get too panicked just yet. Each additional bit roughly doubles
the factoring time, so a 641 bit key would be 10 months, 642 = 20 months,
643 = 40 months... 1024 = something like 1.00E+120 months (a guesstimate,
check the math).

This is not true. A 640 bit RSA key is not 3,4e38 times harder to crack
than a 512 bit RSA key :-)

RSA-512 was broken in 1999
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2098

Sorry to have to correct you on this,
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"