THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
In article <1r5rk1pnef7dhulsefm6r9h900959jtcr8@4ax.com>
admin_rbtor <admin^@^rbtor^.^net> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:20:06 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>
wrote:
In article <74tqk1pvnbbcb686ge7mnq7j9fuj9jf31f@4ax.com>
admin_rbtor <admin^@^rbtor^.^net> wrote:
Ok, so I got into trouble with my ISP for operating a re-mailer. They
consider
it a server which is outside of the TOS of the agreement.
Did you speak to a real human being, or is this all by email?
<snip>
Sorry, I just have to go before I wind up in a deep pile of doo doo.
Regards all,
rbtor_admin
You seem to be a resourceful guy. Hopefully you can work something out
soon, for a service such as the one you've offered for a short time has
been valuable and regarded.
Thanks.
Thank you so very much. I will do something. I owe the re-mailer community a
lot.
People like you, that care, are the ones that encourage me to push forward.
See my other post.
Thanks for caring. It is very much appreciated.
Oh, it was by telephone. They were very nice about it. I broke the TOS, they
just cautioned me about it in a very pleasant way. Since they were so nice, I
am bound to reciprocate.
The new service I hope to offer will be more reliable. The darn constant
updates to Windows that requires a reboot or to the firewall security center
requiring a reboot means I might lose mail. I am exploring options of someone
holding incoming mail if a reboot is needed. That way I won't miss anything. I
am striving for 100% stats. I'll do the best I can do for the users of the
re-mailer community. When you send mail through me, it is a responsibility
that I don't take lightly. I look at myself as a common carrier, just like the
postal service. I don't care what the mail is, but it must get through.
1) You shouldn't ever lose mail. If your machine is down, the
remote sending machine should retry later. If your machine goes
down before the SMTP session officially finishes, the sending
machine (yours or theirs) should retry later.
2) If you are still worried, investigate "secondary MX".
<<==========>>
Subject: WHY EELBASH?
E,e'l.B@$h - the only adult remailer operator
Eelbasher
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Proof of E E L's psychosis
In article <ALSD1Y6I38640.6392592593@anonymous.poster>
Wolff Wehrkugel <wehrkugel@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
I use hashcash with the remailer as I do with Panta, so I don't see
any disclaimer. But what is wrong with the disclaimer? I thought
the whole idea was to irritate people enough to use hashcash but
not enough to stop using the remailer.
You must be awfully sensitive if a little 31 line disclaimer bothers
you that much.
Hi Eelbash. How are you?
