THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER





Eelbash Admin wrote:

On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:31:40 +0000, Anonymous wrote:

Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal
counsel, I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday
that he has flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.

Why don't you use your one remaining brain cell to read what Zax wrote
again.

He installed nntp filters. Those are for his usenet server.

I stand corrected; but isn't filtering a flood going out through an nntp
server the same, legally, ethically, and morally (what is the
difference between ethics and morals?) as filtering a flood going through
an smtp server?

It is not.

If Zax thinks filtering a flood through an nntp server is ok, then I still
feel that I can appeal to that example as a justification for filtering a
flood going through my smtp server.

Steve is filtering 'floods' (BI and stuff like that). You are filtering
on keywords.

And to me Steve's news server is just like any other newsserver that
carries remailer messages. People that complain about anonymous messages
have to complain to the last remailer in the chain.

Even Frog-Admin filtered at his news server. I think he also filtered at
his remailer though, but I am not sure. You are a lot worse when it
comes to filtering and distorting message content. I can't decide if you
are a joke or a danger to the remailing community. Do you even feel you
are part of it?

I hope Zax or Twisty will clear up the legal aspects of this filtering.
In any case, the filtering at Zax' news server is automated and not all
groups are monitored. Only APA-S.

I think you should see the news service and remailer service as separate
identities.

Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"