THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SHITBAG PEDOPHILE, GET THE FUCK OUT NOW!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU HATEFUL STINKING SCUMBAG PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY PERVERT PEDOPHILE GET OUT!



In article <pan.2005.11.08.22.15.17.549189@eelbash.yi.org>
Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:

I've got to tell you, that I have never seen such an irruption of legalese
as I have since Twisty arrived on the scene, and now you.

You're the shit-for-brains remop, not Twisty.

Subject: Re: Ok, what's not working with Type II?

In article <68d61778f2e997f3f86e4deef6bf0631@remailer.metacolo.com>
Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

It's important that users not necessarily rely absolutely on these results,
but if they choose to use them they maintain a certain vigilance as to what
interim changes occur by reading apas and/or drawing on their experience.
The results.txt list is meant to be used in conjunction with my gatepick
program, but to get a better sense of what historically are good and bad
routes I think my chart at http://www.cotse.net/users/drsnoid/results.gif
provides something a little more tangible.  Also s
http://www.quicksilvermail.net/mail2news.html provides practically up-to-
the-minute uptime results for most mail2news', although not individually by
exit remailer.

Thank you for your tests results, I have found them useful!

Subject: Re: Moron flooder  "eelbash"  was "Frog"


Dermott McDermott wrote:

Somebody named Secure Beer has been mentioned as the floodr or at least one of the biggest flooders. I am not sure of his reason for flooding if he is the flooder, but something about wanting to make the remailer system his way and being blocked by frog admin? I mean frog admin found him flooding or something from the headers of his messages. And since then this Secure Beer has been having an unending hissy fit and floods and so on, sort of like a baby stamping his foot.

I like Secure Beer. And under the monker of Champerty he was subjected
to floods himself IIRC. And he wrote a FAQ (so flooding would not be his
style). The floods also attacked me and Champerty at first (mainly me at
the end of it), but that doesn't clear him just like the floods being
pro Frog-Admin doesn't clear that man either.

Whatever it is, it is decremental to the status remailer users have on
usenet.

Remops where never liked by the majority of internet users IMHO.

If that is correct why do you think it is? Is it that the majority of internet users do not see the importance of Freedom of Speech the way remops do?

Remops are seen as facilitators and defenders of abuse by many usenet
readers. Just post anonymously to a group besides APA-S or ASP and you
will see this (unless they don't know what remailers are yet).

Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR