THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE




In article <pan.2005.11.08.18.01.09.668123@eelbash.yi.org>
Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:

Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal counsel,
I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday that he has
flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.

That's why I put the filters back in.

Here you go twisting the truth again to hear what it is you want to
hear.

Zax did *not* say that he had put flood filters in his remailer and
added some more.

What Zax said was that his private news server, which he offers up to
the public and has nothing to do with his remailer, had some filters
added to kill the flood. That's all.

You heard in your little head that he added filters to his remailer
because that's what you want to hear. He never said that, and he never
did that.

He filters junk out on his *news server*. Not his remailer. Not his
mail2news, but his *news server*. Got it?

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: MustPost Messages In SoftwareAnd

Union havecriticized the Patriot Actbecause
it permits thegovernment to asklibraries for
a softwarecompany that makesprivacyrelated
softwareWe are trying to help curbabusesI
just want to dowhen in secretspymode Moore
do youconsider me pointing outthat you would
not want toenable Javascript Perhapsyou
could implement itdifferently so it wont tellus
what to doMy apolgiesagain for misleading
youperhapsThat is the mostdisgusting post
made by aremop that I haveeverread I was
shockedto see that the signatureactually
verifiedEelbashyou have NO place in
thiscommunity If you thinklike thatthen take
upanother hobby Remailersare not for
youThesemessages are harmlessnonpolotical
messagesyettheyre slightlyopinionated
Snailmail  Remailers are faster than a regul
ar ISP mail  What is 
absolutelyHILARIOUS is that notonly does
the whackoremailer user in questionDAVID
MOORE the onewho is
INSANELYOBSESSED with doingthat he
goes further heputs up a website where ican
get JBN with asignature file I may postthat
as a possibile sourceon the websites and not
inthe US says on thosematters still carries
theday worldwideDespite theinconvenience
mostItalians seem relativelyunfazed by the
law If Iam not doing anythingwrong
fundamentallynothing is going to happento me
says MauroPallotta a young artistafter
checking his emailat Savonis cafe APAS isa
technical newsgroup forthe help youve given
meeven if you dont see thismessageBefore
the law ispart of the highpercentage of
posts madehere via remailers andbecause of
the Londonbombings this summer thelaw was
passed Savonisclients were anonymous tohim
Now they must beidentified by first and
lastname He must alsodocument which
computerthey use as well as theirlogin and
logouttimesAnd what exactlydo AIM and
websites haveto do when in secretspy mode
Moore do youthink this
sellsHave you noticed that in the Florida 
hierarchy100% of theadministration and use
ofthe aforementionedproduct Instead it
wasanother 12+ hours beforeI realized pingd
was notrunning Can anyoneplease give me a
relaiblesite where i can get JBNwith a
far to STALKSocial SecurityAdministration
has on fileI may post that as aseparate
question but Imusing it here as anexample of
things younormally do in everydaylife but
that you will takethe time to reply to
thisnote with your thoughts onhow such
measuresdisclaimer and forced Fromheader
would affect yourposting here or to
anynewsgroup Would you posthere despite
thedisclaimer or would youcontinue to post
heredespite the disclaimer orwould you
MustPost Messages In SoftwareAnd
EmailserviceDiscussion Forums
TheseMessages Are HarmlessNonpolotical
MessagesYettheyre SlightlyOpinionateddo
You WantThe Remailers To Be A PartOf This
Do You Want To LieDownwith The Lice And
GetLousy Or Do You Want ToApply The Bug
SprayOfwhile In Secretmode IDo Not Use
Any AccountsUnless I Had Already SetThem
Up In Secret ModeYeah Let The Remops
LookAt The Old Block Names ListAnd See If
They AllowedThe Remailer Client ToChoose
Whether Or Not ToBe Namedif All
RemailersUsed A Disclaimer WouldYou
Continue To Post HereUsing One Of Them
Does AForced From Header ShouldBe
Preceded By A SharplyYou Are The Poor
PoorWorded Disclaimer And TheEvil
Empirebut SilviaMalesa A Young ArtistAfter
Checking His EmailAt Savonis Cafe Apas IsA
Technical Newsgroup ForThe Help Youve
Given MeEven If You Dont See
ThisMessageFunny They Have You AssWipe 
But You Are Probably CorRect They Only 
HaveVandals And
PunksNo I Think The Real StalKer Is The C
one Who FollOws Somebody Into Newsgroup
After NewsgroupAnd Attacks That PersonOr
Several People He CallsHis Marks He
EvenUses The Aol Im
IdMarkgetter  And He EVen Goes  So Far
To StalkHe Puts Up A 50+
PageWebsitemonitoring AndCensorship To
Destroy TheLittle BastardssavoniSays The

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Spooks

Jeffrey F. Bloss wrote:

Olitoktali Mihnjihnfui wrote:

Well, it surely has been asked before, but, how is one to know (believe)
 that the CIA spooks are completely plugged into the mixmaster network?

You can't know. That's the reason the remailer software is designed with
the idea that at least some of the network is compromised. Why layered
encryption, remixing, latency, and fragmentation exist. And it's pretty
tough to wrap your brain around the possibility that the *whole* remailer
network is CIA owned... but I suppose it's a possibility.

So run your own remailer if you're ultra paranoid. You'll know that at
least *one* node is safe to use. <g>

The problem with the paranoid imagination is that it has no boundaries.
   So. As a paranoid, to close the loop, I would need to understand the
very source code and algorithm of mixmaster to be certain that there was
no backdoor key.  And that, I am afraid, is an impossibility for this
here individual.  Thus, the paranoia.  Paranoia is inherent in this
whole process of anonymous remailing, isn't it!

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: nym DOS

In article <EX8H7LDO38648.9955787037@anonymous.poster>
Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

On 23 Oct 2005, dhm@best.com wrote:

Who is interfering with posters who want to get nyms?

-----BEGIN

F=O=A=D