THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
In article <ON39M7SC38664.6647337963@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Howard) wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
BTW, twisty was concerned with altering the content of mail, not the issue
of permitting floods.
No kidding? I could have sworn he blocked me because I announced I had put
in filters to block floods - nothing about altering the content of mail
Maybe twisty misunderstood what he read. Or did I phrase it confusingly?
Well, here it is again:
Agressive flood filters are in place. If you send too many messages
in too rapid succession to the same email address or newsgroup, some
of them may not make it. Sorry about that, but, the psychos have
been busy and I am sure you will understand the need to keep them
from disrupting newsgroups or preying on individuals
I don't see anything there that talks about altering the content of email,
but that's the notice that twisty reacted to.
I happen to be a close friend of twisty. You can tell by my other posts
today. Here is what my friend wrote:
Cool it. You are sounding suspiciously like a sock puppet.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: More Reasons To Avoid Eelbash
On 23 Oct 2005, Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Teddy) wrote:
On 23 Oct 2005, Wolff Wehrkugel <wehrkugel@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
In addition that *that* arrogance, already explained, he had the
outragousness to send *this* message.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Anonymous Sender <anonym...@remailer.metacolo.com>
wrote:
On 4 Jan 2004, <admin@[CENSORED].dynu.com> wrote:
You are afflicted with [SOD OFF]ing self-[BLOCKED]ness. How long before you
filter out discussions of [WRONG SPEECH]? [BAD THOUGHT]? [SOD OFF]?
[BANNED]? What else is
"[FLAKE OFF] in civilized discourse" in [FORGET IT]'s [HATE THOUGHT]
little world of
[NICHEVO]ing [VERBOTEN] [NO WAY]ness?
I would defend to the death your right to express your opinion.
Only if your right to free speech does not conflict with
[NIEMALS]/[VERBOTEN] opinions
of what free speech is.
Not at all: the Congo Remailer is open to all opinions, the more diverse,
the better. I treat all messages like the Crown Jewels, faithfully
transmitting them, with due care to obscure any information about the
origin of the message.
[CENSORED]/[NO WAY] = The Net [SOD OFF]
Congo = The Civil Remailer.
[In the interests of promoting civility,
one or more crude expressions have been replaced
with a stamp, in brackets, to symbolize their
unacceptability in civilized discourse]
Wonder what happens?
fuck
shit
crap
Eeelbash
asshole
dickhead
penis
fuckhead
dumbass
asswipe
butthead
braindead
cock
cocksucker
pussy
pussylicker
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: remailers to give up keys?
In article <UD9P7ZXE38646.2953356481@remailer@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote:
References: <4301b0d2$0$11061$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
<ccdb148aace8030aaba187812baeb150@dizum.com>
<CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au>
In article <CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au>
Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, "Thomas J. Boschloo"
<nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
It is very important that we do not repeat our
history. America is way
to bloody and aggressive right now for a stable
world with respect for
all religions. I also repeat my claim that they
have not learned from
WWII (thinking of Bush (your Avatar of War)).
Before you go plastering invective all over the US
for "bloody and
aggressive" actions, you need to look at where the
bloodshed over radical
Islam began, and who has been throwing the "first
stones". America (and
Western civilization) has been fighting off
elements of radical Islam for
more than 20 years.
The west has been on the defensive.
In order to think clearly, you really have to get
past your media generated
hatred for Bush. It clouds your perception.
Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?
CNN
Such uninformed BS could only come from a Foxnews watcher.
