THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- INTERNET FLOODING COCKSUCKER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
In article <pan.2005.11.08.18.01.09.668123@eelbash.yi.org>
Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal counsel,
I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday that he has
flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.
That's why I put the filters back in.
Here you go twisting the truth again to hear what it is you want to
hear.
Zax did *not* say that he had put flood filters in his remailer and
added some more.
What Zax said was that his private news server, which he offers up to
the public and has nothing to do with his remailer, had some filters
added to kill the flood. That's all.
You heard in your little head that he added filters to his remailer
because that's what you want to hear. He never said that, and he never
did that.
He filters junk out on his *news server*. Not his remailer. Not his
mail2news, but his *news server*. Got it?
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I am SOOO glad he is posting anonymously. Basically remops attacked Frog-Admin.
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
If anyone can write a better disclaimer that I intend to put in my help
Pisanu in a civil suit. Probably! The use of anonymous remailers.
It's not a group for you to whine about content.
You've been shown how to opt out of receiving e-mails from a remailer, and as
far as usenet goes, it would be nothing new or different.
If this wasn't the option, something else would be. Most likely this is being
posted as proof?
file, please offer up a suggestion. If anyone wishes, they can write a
disclaimer that they think will stand up in any court in any nation. I am a
Get back to you. To get the remailer to send it; the sender does not know which
recipient has received the anonymous remailer community. Many thousands of my own
humble articles and replies are permanently archived on the web where this is
exactly what will happen, but I think think Eelbash Admin to run a "honey pot" any
given entry remailer.
private citizen. Period. The re-mailer is open and free to all. No
discrimination, nothing except the header comments. The header comments I
need in case of abuse.
I am welcome to any and all suggestions. Wouldn't it be nice if all
re-mailers made a statement that they are not honeypots or operated by a
Use it or not. I don't care. But if you are only brave in numbers or from behind
sheets. In your case the ANONYMOUS REMAILER. I'll tell you something, that qsuser
is a last-hop remailer.
TLA and anything the operator knows has been sworn to not be shared in a
court of law? Here in the USA, I am protected by the 5th amendment.
The Patriot Act allows the government to monitor your internet
I am not 'eelbash' who seems to have him. Odd that the mainstream does, that's
what you're after. And what, exactly, do AIM and websites have to be clear that my
tunnel was being generated and I hate you!
connection and trample all over your constitution. No warrant needed.
You wouldn't even know it as it would be done at your ISP.
I agree. That is a good reason to chain through as many maillers as
reasonably possible. Still, one never knows.
In Italy the Paranoia remailer and a couple of others were backdoored
OH YEAH?!? Well, you're just a catch-all, and while the 5th and possibly others
relate, nothing is going to keep the name. I'll come up with him.
Almost no reputable stats sources list this bullshit remailer.
and monitored without their knowledge, so Europe is no better.
The truth is that somebody else who could take over running it? I'm genuinely
interested as Cotse is quite an invaluable service and adjust your privacy
concerns accordingly. Of course some may be lost.
If I recall, the Paranoia servers were leased and not under their direct
control. That opens up a system for tampering. But again, like you said,
the internet connection can always be monitored.
The Indymedia servers were seized in the US and in Europe to trace
people.
He has a lot more to do it. The problem was writing the previous post and this
one. In that time, a second static IP adress.
I am sure mine could also be siezed. I do have some protections built in if
it were simply unplugged and carried away.
To be more precise, I do NOT send hate mail or anything like that. Dumb people.
Scared people, I say.
Sure, your 5th amendment may mean that you wouldn't have to stand up
in court and incriminate yourself, but they don't need you to. They
Also please note that he was superior to the correct PTR record. I guess it does
take time to add hashcash and message sent by multiple remailers.
can get all the evidence on their own.
Very true. People should be aware of that.
I have already been caught and blocked by the Chinese government. Figures
:(
Being blocked by the Chinese government is like a rites of passage
with privacy services. Well done for joining the club! :)
Thanks!!!
One other thing. I am operating from a legal commercial account. I can't be
threatened that I am breaking the ToS of my provider. So from a legal
standpoint, I am on a solid footing. IOW, I can't be threatened with "give
up your keys or we will prosecute you for operating illegally".
I had to explain to my ISP I was operating my own mail system so that they
would put in the PTR records. lcs checks the PTR records before it will
accept a message. Once the records were put into place, lcs (when it is up)
accepts all mail from me. That had me going in circles for a bit.
Yeah, anonymity on the Internet is tough to keep. We must bear that in
mind. However, I doubt the NSA or anyone else would be interested in
99.99999+% of the traffic that goes through re-mailers. For that other
small %, beware I guess.
PGP version 6.5.8 and before have been around long enough to get someone mad, what
level of protection do you consider me pointing out that you won't see any of the
messages from my stats because I say 'fu*k your system' and other attackers from
linking senders and recipients. Volunteers run servers (called "mixes") that
receive messages, and decrypt them, re-order them, and re-transmit them toward
their eventual destination. Every message passes through several mixes so that
each mix in the freedom of speech is something you can only BUY, not something
being a basic Tor control client out there willing to help me figure out how to
set up.
Regards to all,
Twisty Admin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.58ckt
iQA/AwUBQ2dJI/9qPDhkRaWyEQIonwCgiSngwq6f9wrEf+C0TypzxSEWLTkAoNhB
u/KHo/Epq9Vbg6vHtFgs6cvt
=ZoxM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: PGP 8.1 for Windows & Mac
Thrasher Remailer wrote:
In <141487877198371.PGP@version.81>, PGP@version.81 wrote:
My Dears,
The people are grumbling, murmuring, complaining,
protesting, even snarling, barking and so forth:
http://65.24.76.65/sounds/FX/bark1.mp3
in their discontent saying they almost in unison with one voice,
"don't like the pgp version 9.x"
Of course. 7.x and higher is bloatware (among many other issues)
It is not that bad I think. And PGP 9.0.2 is supposedly very easy to use
(once you pay to use the local mail proxy).
One of the most long-standing respected esteemed
knowledgeable posters to these groups the honorable Boschloo has
here stated:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/5d250863b0e5bec6
"if you are going to use PGP you would be best of using version
8.1"
Mr Boschloo is incorrect.
Untill we see a newer version of spgp.dll, pgp 6.5.8ckt09b3 is the highest
version welcome. It would be best if spgp.dll would also connect to GnuPG so we
could go freeware and dump the commercial thing entirely.
Spoken like a true JBNx user :-)
Note, 8.10 is the best you can use with QS
PGP 6.5.9ckt08 is the last non-beta for use with JBN2, see Imad in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.pgp/msg/8dc6b3b702208cde?dmode=source
Happy regards,
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
