THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- THE FEMALE EUNUCH




Zax <fleegle@bananasplit.info> wrote:

This is an example where banana does act as an exit and is subject to
local news filters.  Then again, it takes a concious effort on the users
part to hardcode banana as the exit node, it would never be randomly
selected.

WRONG AGAIN ZAX!

That's why middlemen remailers randhop messages to exit remailers.
BECAUSE CLIENTS DO CHOOSE MIDDLEMAN REMAILERS RANDOMLY EVEN AS EXIT NODE!

Get a clue!

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)

roadburner wrote:

Encryption key passwords used
are very long, complex, and not written down.

How do you remember them? Remembering passwords is a real pain for me, and
if you can remember the complex ones you use, and have some system for
doing it rather than a very good memory, please share it with the rest of
us.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Privacy issue - how to spoof/hide IP when accessing email / usenet
servers ?


Excuse the top-post, but it seems to me that a really good ng to find
solutions involving email anonymity would be alt.privacy.anon-server


Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in
news:0fj0m1hir34fhqg5ehf7p8gop57lo0pvs0@4ax.com:

On 25 Oct 2005 23:59:29 -0700, spamharvestor@gmail.com said in
alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent:

What is needed now is to find a way to enable Mr. Activist to fake his
_originating_ IP, and if Mr. Activist can use different (fake) IP
everytime he sends out messages, hopefully it wouldn't be so easy for
the Chinese authority to trace back to the exact location of Mr.
Activist's whereabout.

Also, every time he tries to send an email, the email server sends him
packets (read the RFC for the email protocol), and he never gets them,
because they're being sent to the wrong address, so his email program
never gets past the first "hello, mail server, are you there?" packet.

In countries such as the United States, where the authority must follow
the law, and the law states that they can't hold people without damning
evidence, it's easier for people to carry out whistle blowing
activities.

Not so in China.

Sure it is.  The authorities are following the law.  A law which gives
them the authority to read every internet packet going through their
country.

So it's not a parcel undeliverable due to a fake address, but it's the
other way around - the parcel can be delivered, because the receiver's
address is real.

No, the parcel that says, "yes, I'm here, send me the address to send
the mail to" can't be delivered to the mail sender's email program, so
the program can never send the mail.

Email can't be UDP, because email is a verified protocol - the program
knows that it's been delivered to the next point.  If you want to send
unverified packets - UDP - there are plenty of programs that do it -
but that's not how email works.

It's just that we need to protect the sender by faking his originating
address.

Again - faking his email address prevents him from sending email. Talk
just sends packets blind, so it doesn't need a return address. But
there's no way to know that something you sent by talk got there,
since there's no one to tell if it did - no return address.

Your choice - non-hidden address or no way of knowing if the message
got to the intended recipient.