THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
In <436605d9$0$11066$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, nospam@hccnet.nl wrote:
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Signature: 0x225CA009 Thomas J. Boschloo <boschloo@multiweb.nl>
Date: Mon Oct 31 05:52:38 2005
Status: OK (Invalid)
Thrasher Remailer wrote:
In <141487877198371.PGP@version.81>, PGP@version.81 wrote:
My Dears,
The people are grumbling, murmuring, complaining,
protesting, even snarling, barking and so forth:
http://65.24.76.65/sounds/FX/bark1.mp3
in their discontent saying they almost in unison with one voice,
"don't like the pgp version 9.x"
Of course. 7.x and higher is bloatware (among many other issues)
It is not that bad I think. And PGP 9.0.2 is supposedly very easy to use
(once you pay to use the local mail proxy).
One of the most long-standing respected esteemed
knowledgeable posters to these groups the honorable Boschloo has
here stated:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/5d250863b0e5bec6
"if you are going to use PGP you would be best of using version
8.1"
Mr Boschloo is incorrect.
Untill we see a newer version of spgp.dll, pgp 6.5.8ckt09b3 is the highest
version welcome. It would be best if spgp.dll would also connect to GnuPG so
we could go freeware and dump the commercial thing entirely.
Spoken like a true JBNx user :-)
damn right i am! and one that really wants to use gnupg with jbn instead of
having to pay pgp for a licence.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:30:05 +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Some very angry and disturbed tripe, below.
The Eelbash remailer is a last-hop remailer.
It provides full FROM headers.
Disclaimers are put into newsgroups as needed.
Oh great, tampering with mail again. Fuck you.
If all else fails, the newsgroup will be temporarily blocked.
How the hell are we supposed to know if they are blocked?
I'll let you know here.
The Eelbash remailer allows PLAIN TEXT messages only.
All the easier for you to read them. You perverted fucking asshole.
Don't talk nonsense; all it means is that html is not allowed, and
binaries are not allowed.
Eelbash, you are a liar. LIAR.
What it actually means is that messages do not have to be encrypted to be
accepted. HTML and binaries ARE accepted, if they are encrypted.
Either you are a liar, or so truly incompetent that you honestly don't know
what PLAIN TEXT accepted actually means. So which is it? Huge liar, or
painfully incompetent?
Flood filters are in place.
In-Out-In. Make up your fucking mind.
Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal counsel,
I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday that he has
flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.
That's why I put the filters back in.
You are not a remailer, you are a psycho. Get the fuck out already.
Pingers, please remove Eelbash from your lists. He has violated every rule
in the book. Eelbash cannot be considered a remailer.
Remops, please block this asshole. You may be depriving someone of their
right to privacy. He only allows plain text messages for his perverted
viewing pleasure.
You are a sick young fellow (or girl); get help.
A copy of this post is at http://eelbash.yi.org:81/miscx/post/20051108002.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDcOeBYyZq98cTxEkRAlbVAJ4zf4LfqeCqCacEfrJ95WW6tV7fzQCggybj
bkg9Tw2U3eKm4SIg3btutN8=
=mKXC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: VANDALS and PUNKS
company that makes
privacyrelated software
We are trying to help curb
abusesIf I see too many
instances of nastiness
showing up on the net I
may feelthe need to jump
back in and start
monitoring again blocking
follows fromthat
censorship to the
Shyster and after that
making known the id ofthe
His Marks He Even
VANDALS and PUNKS
No I think the REAL stal
ker is the cone who FOLL
OWS somebody into
newsgroup after newsgroup
and attacks that person
or several people he calls
his MARKS He even
uses the AOL IM ID
MARKGETTER and he e
ven goes so far to STALK
he puts up a 50+ page
websitemonitoring and
censorship to destroy the
little bastardsSavoni
says the new law violates
his privacy comparing it to
HIM POOR BABY Anyone
given thought to the
CubansEven if you are one
of the lice remailers that
follow such anThe
employment database is
required to include all
such data maintained by
the Department of
Homeland Security
combined with what the
ven goes so far to STALK
Social Security
Administration has on file
I may post that as a
separate question but Im
using it here as an
example of things you
normally do in everyday
life but that you will take
the time to reply to this
note with your thoughts on
how such measures
disclaimer and forced From
header would affect your
posting here or to any
newsgroup Would you post
here despite the
disclaimer or would you
continue to post here
despite the disclaimer or
would you choose another
remailer Get back to me
when you want to do when
in secretspy mode
Moore do you think from
