THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- THE HUMAN MAGGOT
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUMBAG
Thrasher Remailer wrote:
In <436605d9$0$11066$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, nospam@hccnet.nl wrote:
Thrasher Remailer wrote:
In <141487877198371.PGP@version.81>, PGP@version.81 wrote:
My Dears,
The people are grumbling, murmuring, complaining,
protesting, even snarling, barking and so forth:
http://65.24.76.65/sounds/FX/bark1.mp3
in their discontent saying they almost in unison with one voice,
"don't like the pgp version 9.x"
Of course. 7.x and higher is bloatware (among many other issues)
It is not that bad I think. And PGP 9.0.2 is supposedly very easy to use
(once you pay to use the local mail proxy).
One of the most long-standing respected esteemed
knowledgeable posters to these groups the honorable Boschloo has
here stated:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/5d250863b0e5bec6
"if you are going to use PGP you would be best of using version
8.1"
Mr Boschloo is incorrect.
Untill we see a newer version of spgp.dll, pgp 6.5.8ckt09b3 is the highest
version welcome. It would be best if spgp.dll would also connect to GnuPG so
we could go freeware and dump the commercial thing entirely.
Spoken like a true JBNx user :-)
damn right i am! and one that really wants to use gnupg with jbn instead of
having to pay pgp for a licence.
So you use JBN commercially?
Kind Regards,
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: remailers to give up keys?
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, nonalt <nonalt@hod.aarg.net> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
<nobody@cypherpunks.to> wrote:
In article <UD9P7ZXE38646.2953356481@remailer@twistycreek.com>wrote:
Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?
CNN
Such uninformed BS could only come from a Foxnews watcher.
Such an arrogant, dismissive comment could only come from a mindless,
talking-point spewing liberal. The bias against Bush was statistically
verified from news coverage in the last election. More than 85% of
journalists are *self described* as "Democrats". More than 85%.
They say what they're paid to say by the people who OWN the
media you dumb shit.
Newsflash, moron: TV news is only a tiny part of the coverage. Calling me
names doesn't change the facts and statistics. Journalists still find the
news, they decide what is newsworthy, and then write the copy in a way that
frames the issue. TV news is 99.9% recycled wire copy and newspaper
coverage anyway, usually a day late.
Are you so stupid you think the talking heads write the drivel they
read off the teleprompter?
Are you so ignorant that you believe Rupert Murdoch is down in the
producer's booth writing copy for the teleprompters?
Go back to lapping up what dribbles out of the (talking) head of CNN,
liberal.
Go back to sucking down whatever spurts out of the cock of Satan,
you Nazi shit.
See? Stupid, pointless lame attempts to be insulting is all you get from
idiots like this. What does that mean, exactly? See, my point was a really
clever allusion between the head of a penis, and a "talking head". Your
reply is just a childish outburst, similar to a 4 year old stopping his
little feet and screaming "Oh yeah? OH YEAH?!? Well, you're just a
doodyhead and I hate you! Boo hoohoohoohoo!"
PS: Nazi's were LEFT, not RIGHT. I believe the pejorative you were trying
to pull out of you shriveled, little, substandard brain is "fascist".
No charge for the home schooling. In fact, here's one more lesson, free of
charge: when you have ZERO facts on your side, and all you have to work
with is uninformed, unsubstantiated, unsupported really stupid opinion,
then you really should keep your Daddies favorite cock-hole shut.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Teddybor - new remailer?
In article <00cb5e0e477863ab68810234bc947b5e@firenze.linux.it>
Tarapia Tapioco <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote:
In article <TQ8DAJ8S38650.5662615741@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Nobody) wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Tarapia Tapioco <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it>
wrote:
What's the story with this remailer:
$remailer{"teddybor"} = "<mixmaster@teddyb.org> mix remix
inflt50 rhop5 post";
Seems like a solid re-mailer. Entry and exit. Good stats and pretty quick.
Glad to have him.
Odd that the stats show 0:00 latency across the board.
I just noticed from teddybor's remailer-stats that its pool size = 1.
