THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT




In <436605d9$0$11066$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, nospam@hccnet.nl wrote:

=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Signature: 0x225CA009 Thomas J. Boschloo <boschloo@multiweb.nl>
Date: Mon Oct 31 05:52:38 2005
Status: OK  (Invalid)

Thrasher Remailer wrote:

In <141487877198371.PGP@version.81>, PGP@version.81 wrote:

    My Dears,
             The people are grumbling, murmuring, complaining,
protesting, even snarling, barking and so forth:
http://65.24.76.65/sounds/FX/bark1.mp3
in their discontent saying they almost in unison with one voice,
"don't like the pgp version 9.x"

Of course. 7.x and higher is bloatware (among many other issues)

It is not that bad I think. And PGP 9.0.2 is supposedly very easy to use
(once you pay to use the local mail proxy).

             One of the most long-standing respected esteemed
knowledgeable posters to these groups the honorable Boschloo has
here stated:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/5d250863b0e5bec6
"if you are going to use PGP you would be best of using version
8.1"

Mr Boschloo is incorrect.

Untill we see a newer version of spgp.dll, pgp 6.5.8ckt09b3 is the highest
version welcome.  It would be best if spgp.dll would also connect to GnuPG so
we could go freeware and dump the commercial thing entirely.

Spoken like a true JBNx user :-)

damn right i am!  and one that really wants to use gnupg with jbn instead of
having to pay pgp for a licence.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Spooks

LoL

<<==========>>

Subject: wE lOVE yLBASHOU eE


lpar jgnY@O.Y'bY U$R,R

EelbashR


-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.