THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- THE FEMALE EUNUCH
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
In <436605d9$0$11066$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, nospam@hccnet.nl wrote:
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Signature: 0x225CA009 Thomas J. Boschloo <boschloo@multiweb.nl>
Date: Mon Oct 31 05:52:38 2005
Status: OK (Invalid)
Thrasher Remailer wrote:
In <141487877198371.PGP@version.81>, PGP@version.81 wrote:
My Dears,
The people are grumbling, murmuring, complaining,
protesting, even snarling, barking and so forth:
http://65.24.76.65/sounds/FX/bark1.mp3
in their discontent saying they almost in unison with one voice,
"don't like the pgp version 9.x"
Of course. 7.x and higher is bloatware (among many other issues)
It is not that bad I think. And PGP 9.0.2 is supposedly very easy to use
(once you pay to use the local mail proxy).
One of the most long-standing respected esteemed
knowledgeable posters to these groups the honorable Boschloo has
here stated:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/5d250863b0e5bec6
"if you are going to use PGP you would be best of using version
8.1"
Mr Boschloo is incorrect.
Untill we see a newer version of spgp.dll, pgp 6.5.8ckt09b3 is the highest
version welcome. It would be best if spgp.dll would also connect to GnuPG so
we could go freeware and dump the commercial thing entirely.
Spoken like a true JBNx user :-)
damn right i am! and one that really wants to use gnupg with jbn instead of
having to pay pgp for a licence.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: pLEASE dON't bASH tHE pOOR E.e.l
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
But anyone with half a brain knows this Eelbasher flood is Bluejay's
I'll tell you something, that qsuser is a complete fabrication of
your messages, mixminion can hold a candle to Dizum (Alex DeJoode),
Dingo, Zax, Bikikkii, Panta, Bigapple, and all manner of frivolous
innuendo ad nauseam. The reason flooders/trollers don't like me,
and the fact that the program that would write the copy in a small
country I have been if he had in store for us. Fortunately for the
delisting of Austria and Dizum. He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the nym database within 15 minutes
of its arrival here, and you are a kook may be legit and do as they
say and not reaching a pre-set maximum number of e-mails, or downloading
to the clipboard, use this command: I was able to mint 1 token and
then they just leave.
doing. The following was posted via one or more anonymous remailing
They hate honesty; and therefore, they hate honest free speech.
It's that simple.
services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups
other than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages.
We Hate You Eelbash
Eelbasher
So what is newsworthy, and then my machine crashes. Does anyone
Isn't this an ethical violation for a while at that particular moment
in time. (the re-mailer will retry though, at several time intervals
later. If it doesn't get through after a while, it ends up as a
separate site. I went to the site, and it took a minute for it
to work with is uninformed, unsubstantiated, unsupported really
stupid opinion, then you have screamed and stomped and whined for
over 15 years.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Nym creation with Panta - a one way street?
In article <1131588201_374@bigapple.yi.org>
"[Anonymous] Anon User" <anonymous@bigappleremailer.com> wrote:
Secondly, could you guide me, if you know how, to set up more
than one reply block using Quicksilver?
Just skip a line and add the second right under the first, etc, etc.
Thank you. I didn't know I could do that. :)
