THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT




In <436605d9$0$11066$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, nospam@hccnet.nl wrote:

=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Signature: 0x225CA009 Thomas J. Boschloo <boschloo@multiweb.nl>
Date: Mon Oct 31 05:52:38 2005
Status: OK  (Invalid)

Thrasher Remailer wrote:

In <141487877198371.PGP@version.81>, PGP@version.81 wrote:

    My Dears,
             The people are grumbling, murmuring, complaining,
protesting, even snarling, barking and so forth:
http://65.24.76.65/sounds/FX/bark1.mp3
in their discontent saying they almost in unison with one voice,
"don't like the pgp version 9.x"

Of course. 7.x and higher is bloatware (among many other issues)

It is not that bad I think. And PGP 9.0.2 is supposedly very easy to use
(once you pay to use the local mail proxy).

             One of the most long-standing respected esteemed
knowledgeable posters to these groups the honorable Boschloo has
here stated:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/5d250863b0e5bec6
"if you are going to use PGP you would be best of using version
8.1"

Mr Boschloo is incorrect.

Untill we see a newer version of spgp.dll, pgp 6.5.8ckt09b3 is the highest
version welcome.  It would be best if spgp.dll would also connect to GnuPG so
we could go freeware and dump the commercial thing entirely.

Spoken like a true JBNx user :-)

damn right i am!  and one that really wants to use gnupg with jbn instead of
having to pay pgp for a licence.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Serious question, related to this "Pangborn" stuff

AD wrote:

" krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:

DAVEY MOORE  -  AGAIN
"AD" <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote in message
news:VIZIJ8T738641.2290740741@reece.net.au...

"Jeffrey F. Bloss" <jbloss@tampabay.mapson.rr.com> wrote:

^  krp ! wrote:

    Sounds like RATIONALIZATION............... *I* have NEVER NEVER
NEVER
NEVER NEVER NEVER used a remailer. GOT IT MORON? NEVER!
I do NOT have the anonymizing software on my computers. PERIOD!

Message-ID: <TNK938ME38419.5208101852@reece.net.au>
Message-ID: <tjhXd.77945$Dc.44771@trnddc06>

The same message posted first through a remailer, then through your own
account.

In regard to the message IDs mentioned above, which are also

mentioned on

the page www.aboutkenpangborn.com/altatheism.html.  To me this seems to
indicate that Kenny is guilty of the very offenses which he accuses

others

of:  forging and harassing through the remailers. The message posted
through the remailer looks like it was a forgery of someone else in
another
group, and the fact that Kenny a short while later sent the exact same
text
from his known address makes it indeed seem that he was the forger.

 Could

I be interpreting this wrong?

If he indeed is the sender, then it would seem he is delibarately

abusing

remailers so that he can have more ammunition in his arguments here in
APAS.  I am curious to know how others may interpret these facts.

OF COURSE YOU DO DAVEY!

My name isn't Davey.  I know you're paranoid, kook, but perhaps you

can get

the idea that everyone isn't "Moore".

And as usual, I note that you have no comments on the actual facts

which prove you again and again to be full of shit.

  He never does. Back peddling and lying is what Kenny does. It is what
he is best known for.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: mixminion

"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Fritz Wuehler wrote:

nobody@winstonsmith.info wrote:

Could someone please tell me when mixminion is expected to
complete its development stage.

Not before Tor reaches its Golden Premium Edition.

You should not expect mixminion to evolve into something offering at least
the functionality of mixmaster and cypherpunk before the next three or four
years.

The mixminion mailing list talks about codecon 2006 in Februari 2006. I
think this is a good sign that there will be some progress (soon):

That is against my personal moral values. Yes, I am not 'eelbash' who seems to
have an unhealthy hold on your side, and all the available servers in the
explanation and not a program failure. Idiots write down their passphrase, or use
their cat's name as a loose framework, but let us know your thoughts. The
questions are intended as a separate program, that would write the copy in a code
or something.  Nope.

http://www.codecon.org/2006/schedule.html

From what I am, so don't bother to express your opinions. I don't even have
absolute faith in God our Grand Designer. Yeah, I was. Who else would post this.

Regards,

"This new law creates a heavy atmosphere," says Savoni, his desk cluttered with
passport photocopies. He is visibly irritated, as he proceeds to halt clients at
the site you'd know that we MUST post through the mix network. It does this by
automatically downloading a server off their own remailer if they allowed the
remailer system, or with the privacy option. The benefit is speed.

Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)

PGP version 6.5.8 and before have been able to mint 1 token and then they just
leave," Savoni says. Most tourists who wander in from the post that arrives at the
site about him? After nearly pissing my pants in the world, and maybe that's why
remailers weren't 'working'.

Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQB5AwUBQ2X2XAEP2l8iXKAJAQH/xgMfeMVeepzFkSyAHdgOvc+xW8DYJ8kE4bSd
rPbPlB7AwJSbygT3k6TlPpGF9w3O5UizAI2IIAhiQBeIxiq+4u29opIN319nnLyP
s+kOLgdxaGzP384u5vJPMluvq9RNdtO/tnyNBg==
=y1cO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----