On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:13:02 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jul 22, 5:59 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:31:46 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jul 21, 5:51 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:17:00 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail..com> wrote:

That may be the case, but the acceptance of relativity does not hinge
on the MMX. The MMX *may* have offered a peek that inspired the guess
that Einstein made (though that isn't historically clear either), but
what sealed relativity versus the emission theory of light are two
happenstances that had nothing to do with the MMX.
1. A number of other experimental consequences that were predicted by
SR that turned out to be right.

there are none.

2. A number of experimental consequences that were predicted by the
emission theory of light that turned out to be wrong.

They have all been shown to be wrong.

The fact that the MMX alone cannot discriminate between the two
theories is irrelevant.

The MMX is just one of many experiments that supports BaTh.

"Henry", as a big of tactical advice, if you're going to mount a
disinformation campaign, it's extremely important to do so from a
position of credibility. Since you are a known and storied
pathological liar, and since you have freely admitted that you have
read nothing which you attempt to discredit, and have been shown to be
generally incompetent in the subject innumerable times, you may find
your position to be less than ideal for the attempt.

Draper, your defence has sunk to such a low level that your only remaining
argument is to persistently call me a liar.

Because you are. There's no point in making an argument with someone
who is completely uninterested in truth.
There is no point in making
an argument to a religious zealot. There is no point in making an
argument to a shameless liar who has not a single care for the
integrity of what he says.

Well I had better stop wasting time arguing with one then.

An argument is a worthwhile strategy for someone who would be
embarrassed to insist the sky is pink after it is made plain that's an
incorrect statement. But you are wholly incapable of being embarrassed
-- a trait that is not uncommon among those who have no personal
dignity remaining.

Why don't you behave like a man and
admit defeat.
No matter what you say or think, there is no doubt that Einsteinian relativity
is now known to be pure nonsense from start to finish.

See? There's another lie. You say it is now known. By whom? Names,
please.

PD

Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible unfortunates. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.

Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

All religion involves selling a nonexistant product to gullible fools. Einstein cleverly exploited this principle with his second postulate.- Hide quoted text -