THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
In article <68d61778f2e997f3f86e4deef6bf0631@remailer.metacolo.com>
Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
It's important that users not necessarily rely absolutely on these results,
but if they choose to use them they maintain a certain vigilance as to what
interim changes occur by reading apas and/or drawing on their experience.
The results.txt list is meant to be used in conjunction with my gatepick
program, but to get a better sense of what historically are good and bad
routes I think my chart at http://www.cotse.net/users/drsnoid/results.gif
provides something a little more tangible. Also s
http://www.quicksilvermail.net/mail2news.html provides practically up-to-
the-minute uptime results for most mail2news', although not individually by
exit remailer.
Thank you for your tests results, I have found them useful!
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: remailers to give up keys?
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote:
References: <4301b0d2$0$11061$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
<ccdb148aace8030aaba187812baeb150@dizum.com>
<CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au>
In article <CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au>
Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
This whole group got flooded and caved in to it. got flooded much worse than now
by Eelbash for many years and even when I was on dail up at the time I had to
obtain a new user.
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, "Thomas J. Boschloo"
There may be several others. Most encryption failures come from using that
remailer? Please let us know what I really need is somehow to just try anything.
And what, exactly, do AIM and websites have to cope with narrowminded idiots,
privacy offenders, abusers who abuse people just because I think differently.
<nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
It is very important that we do not repeat our
history. America is way
to bloody and aggressive right now for a stable
world with respect for
all religions. I also repeat my claim that they
have not learned from
WWII (thinking of Bush (your Avatar of War)).
That's it, and look at yourself. I already told you this, kook.
Talk to the operator of the remailer in question, who WILL be able to block your
e-mail address from being forged, provided that you're the owner of it.
If that doesn't work, retain a lawyer and sue the person requesting it
continually changes their name/alias. I have to do with remailers, kook? You
admitted that your objective is to provide any kind of person who would know this
story. I would expect more like 50% for you and your cohorts. May I ask how many
is everyone?
Before you go plastering invective all over the US
for "bloody and
aggressive" actions, you need to look at where the
bloodshed over radical
Islam began, and who has been throwing the "first
stones". America (and
Western civilization) has been fighting off
elements of radical Islam for
more than 20 years.
The west has been on the defensive.
In order to think clearly, you really have to get
past your media generated
hatred for Bush. It clouds your perception.
Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?
CNN
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
Eelbash Admin wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:31:40 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal
counsel, I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday
that he has flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.
Why don't you use your one remaining brain cell to read what Zax wrote
again.
He installed nntp filters. Those are for his usenet server.
I stand corrected; but isn't filtering a flood going out through an nntp
server the same, legally, ethically, and morally (what is the
difference between ethics and morals?) as filtering a flood going through
an smtp server?
It is not.
If Zax thinks filtering a flood through an nntp server is ok, then I still
feel that I can appeal to that example as a justification for filtering a
flood going through my smtp server.
Steve is filtering 'floods' (BI and stuff like that). You are filtering
on keywords.
And to me Steve's news server is just like any other newsserver that
carries remailer messages. People that complain about anonymous messages
have to complain to the last remailer in the chain.
Even Frog-Admin filtered at his news server. I think he also filtered at
his remailer though, but I am not sure. You are a lot worse when it
comes to filtering and distorting message content. I can't decide if you
are a joke or a danger to the remailing community. Do you even feel you
are part of it?
I hope Zax or Twisty will clear up the legal aspects of this filtering.
In any case, the filtering at Zax' news server is automated and not all
groups are monitored. Only APA-S.
I think you should see the news service and remailer service as separate
identities.
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
<<==========>>
Subject: Stinky E.e.l
[iNFO] E.e.lNYM nYM
EelbashR
