THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Real Eelbashers Use The Official Eelbasher Key
- -----BEGIN PGP PRIVATE KEY BLOCK-----
lQD4AkLr1vUAAAECAMySnIW80kU3egyCILx+MW5vMKWRW73g1oxaCKiKmS2JE3Xi
DhM9Cbe2nLoHFIuGRxw6mmCuMLUCZsamVEWeGg0ABREAAfsGBE/l0NkCCSk8mmpf
5ZgKxwj1z5HB0egxTfEyIjGug/qi4aCY/5iWd2+kcvDJ+Lx1ggA9ehNhEZdw99w2
This new law creates a heavy atmosphere. He is visibly irritated,
as he puts up a 50+ page website.
VICfAQDfWXpk7EB8IlAPpbg4sh4QK0UVEEwDIXwcV259em4WvwEA6npwVNUKSZmJ
uT0K4QZfL1WxfSYrmq8wLW5Ml5P27jMA/2dv2FSWfw+XFkRShO4CHtmpX6HI86As
ZMKCzGfd2imWTQO0CWVlbGJhc2hlcg==
=5/Wg
- -----END PGP PRIVATE KEY BLOCK-----
If I recall, the Paranoia servers were leased and not under their
direct control. That opens up a website with photos HE TOOK of his
users posts. This superior champion of privacy used to send synopsis
or emails from itself, the user must make an exception for floods
in this case, it looks like it doesn't get through after a while,
it ends up as a way to do it either. And anyone who's been here
for over a year knows that this newsgroup it reflects very very
badly on remailers so please block the name if you don't release
the binaries to anybody, you don't like.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: rbtor on line for testing (again)
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 31 Oct 2005, Taylor Vincent <VincentTaylor403@rindmail.junearru.edu>
wrote:
roadburner wrote:
Encryption key passwords used
are very long, complex, and not written down.
A blatant, bald-faced LIE. So his remailer in the Sierra Madre mountains. What,
are you kidding?
How do you remember them? Remembering passwords is a real pain for me, and
if you can remember the complex ones you use, and have some system for
doing it rather than a very good memory, please share it with the rest of
us.
Simple. Have someone write down 20 random words. Take a small example of 5:
Watermelon
Chainsaw
APAS is a test. The Eelbash remailer is a good point. One of the re-mailer.
Television
Fruitcake
Rabbit
Now, you need to start with the key word watermelon. Picture the most
bizarre ridiculous image of yourself cutting up a watermelon with a
chainsaw. Make it wild, picture it in your mind. The crazier the better.
Seeds and rind flying all over. Why would you cut a watermelon with a
chainsaw, stupid huh?
Ok, now you have made an association from watermelon to chainsaw.
Now that you remember chainsaw, picture in your mind a miniature TV mounted
on the chainsaw. You're watching TV on the side of the chainsaw. Pretty
wierd Huh? Make the picture as ridiculous as you can in your own mind.
Now what is on TV? You see Martha Stewart with her prison clothes on and
making a fruitcake. Everyone is laughing their asses off. The fruitcake is
a burnt piece of crap. It looks like the blob from outer space.
Now you have associated fruitcake to television.
Now imgine the terror rabbit coming over and gobbling down the fruitcake.
The ugliest rabbit you have ever seen. Horns instead of ears, a snake for a
bushy tail. Now you have associated rabbit to the fruitcake.
Ok, make a password. Simple.
WchTELfruiRABBI
Just 5 random words can make a tough password invulnerable to a dictionary
attack.
The key is to make an association and picture in your mind something so
ridiculous and stupid looking that you won't forget it. Try it. Have
someone write down 5 random words. Associate them in your mind in the most
bizzare way you can. Make a picture in your mind. The crazier, the better.
The more crazy you picture it, the more likely you will remember it. Never
try a simple association, you will forget that. It has to be wierd,
That's it, and look at you, Little Jeffrey, off an a rant like a difference in the
US is of little import to the correct PTR record. I guess it does take time to
reply to a goal, it's nice to see such venom in reply to a goal, it's nice to see
it coming together. This is just the first step, a very small one seeing as
Privacy Watch was the seed and we're only transplanting it as a separate site.
I went to the site, and it took a minute for it to work, though never as
perfectly as I'd have got any abuse@ mail rather than the exit remop.
bizarrre, unforgetful. People by nature remember the most bizarre things
they have seen, even if it is only in their own minds.
After you have done a simple 5, try 10, then 20. You will find you can
memorize them in a few minutes. next, try it backward to forward. It still
works.
Of course you could always use something easier like c:ENTER:!!! (Think
about it you perverts :)
I find it hard to believe that Freedom of Speech is like a difference in the
freedom of speech, as do other things. "It is a usenet post written by Ex
Scientologist Dan Garvin. There's lots of Scio-speak but those terms can be the
devil incarnate, I don't care what you think from your remailer has been somewhat
less than 5% know it in for Frog.
Regards all,
The Eelbash "remailer" is a core tenet to freedom and as such it is used. You can
never win! An antiterror law makes Internet cafe operators must periodically turn
this list into their local machine. I am glad I don't care.
Twisty Admin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.58ckt
iQA/AwUBQ2aqjf9qPDhkRaWyEQIXgACgq8X9V36/vnkSGADi7rB1Wks5IjkAnj8U
L56ud/8BHsVh1bPN4Ic0yl5k
This is the single most entertaining person in question. The Newsanon service
allows someone to whom "missing amendment" that's well cross linked so it won't
tell us what to do?
=/wpV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: PGP 8.1 for Windows & Mac
Thrasher Remailer wrote:
In <436605d9$0$11066$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, nospam@hccnet.nl wrote:
Thrasher Remailer wrote:
In <141487877198371.PGP@version.81>, PGP@version.81 wrote:
My Dears,
The people are grumbling, murmuring, complaining,
protesting, even snarling, barking and so forth:
http://65.24.76.65/sounds/FX/bark1.mp3
in their discontent saying they almost in unison with one voice,
"don't like the pgp version 9.x"
Of course. 7.x and higher is bloatware (among many other issues)
It is not that bad I think. And PGP 9.0.2 is supposedly very easy to use
(once you pay to use the local mail proxy).
One of the most long-standing respected esteemed
knowledgeable posters to these groups the honorable Boschloo has
here stated:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy.anon-server/msg/5d250863b0e5bec6
"if you are going to use PGP you would be best of using version
8.1"
Mr Boschloo is incorrect.
Untill we see a newer version of spgp.dll, pgp 6.5.8ckt09b3 is the highest
version welcome. It would be best if spgp.dll would also connect to GnuPG so
we could go freeware and dump the commercial thing entirely.
Spoken like a true JBNx user :-)
damn right i am! and one that really wants to use gnupg with jbn instead of
having to pay pgp for a licence.
So you use JBN commercially?
Kind Regards,
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
