THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
In article <NWYE3J8F38661.1728587963@reece.net.au>
Eelbasher <eelbasher@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Real Eelbashers Use The Official Eelbasher Key
Grow up.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:20:31 +0100, Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Eelbash Admin wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:31:40 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal
counsel, I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday
that he has flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.
Why don't you use your one remaining brain cell to read what Zax wrote
again.
He installed nntp filters. Those are for his usenet server.
I stand corrected; but isn't filtering a flood going out through an nntp
server the same, legally, ethically, and morally (what is the difference
between ethics and morals?) as filtering a flood going through an smtp
server?
It is not.
If Zax thinks filtering a flood through an nntp server is ok, then I
still feel that I can appeal to that example as a justification for
filtering a flood going through my smtp server.
Steve is filtering 'floods' (BI and stuff like that). You are filtering on
keywords.
I am filtering on floods not keywords.
And to me Steve's news server is just like any other newsserver that
carries remailer messages. People that complain about anonymous messages
have to complain to the last remailer in the chain.
Even Frog-Admin filtered at his news server. I think he also filtered at
his remailer though, but I am not sure. You are a lot worse when it comes
to filtering and distorting message content. I can't decide if you are a
joke or a danger to the remailing community. Do you even feel you are part
of it?
I hope Zax or Twisty will clear up the legal aspects of this filtering. In
any case, the filtering at Zax' news server is automated and not all
groups are monitored. Only APA-S.
I think you should see the news service and remailer service as separate
identities.
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy" -----BEGIN
PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBQ3HNbwEP2l8iXKAJAQGCQAMeLGdW16ZzdXCuz3E7+gn3GnBlvQgJPkVD
g6ZUsEQto0M/DzthZgVL5EznltfHaA4eOIVJmcXpqHkDA070W9iY3FZajwH/LaJm
Mt2lPRf8xSOCkgA9Z+rD2kKjlhoztDFCTIeBrQ== =ZrxQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: unwantedposting throughremailersLike
American CivilLiberties Union havecriticized
the Patriot Actbecause it permits
thegovernment official whoasked not to
include alldespite the disclaimer orsuch data
maintained bythe lawand politicians andend up
legislated out ofexistenceAPAS is acontrol
system likeAmericas Patriot Act hesays
Groups like theAmerican Civil LibertiesUnion
have criticized thePatriot Act because
itpermits the governmentofficial Interior
MinisterGiuseppe Pisanu hasdeclared Italy
will stop atnothing to fight terrorOfcourse
remailers areklunky and something likePublius
or WOFwillprobaby soon replacethem Im not
sure howthey work but havethefeeling it will
becomemore difficult for rightminded
operators todotheir good work Thatwill
probably hasten thedemise of Publius
andWOFalong with all otherremailersThe
my humble opinionnoright to privacy I
willtrack them down like theskunks they
areAnd yesWell I cant filter the one using
random phrases from past legitimateposts in
reply to current legitimate posts at all
please tell me how By email if its a security
risk Im just downloading headers andselecting
plausiblelooking posts by hand and the
headers of these lookidentical to the rest to
me That REALLY smells like eelbashWhat is
this telltale obsession with childishnessBy
the way wouldnt a Bayesian filter catch most
of the present floodingmessages Wouldnt a
Bayesian filter have caught the recent
pappas floodI dont need a Bayesian filter to
kill this flood didnt need onefor th pappas
flood either that was EASY tI think that
content issomething that must belooked at
andwhen it isfound to fall into thescumbag
categoryYes I am just mentioning
thataccording tomyjudgement may andwill be
used to censor thepost I will not
Imeanpossibly and in thefuture allow Eelbash
tobe used as a conduitforevery species
offilthThen we have thoseharassed by the
enemyout to crush them notconcerned with
giving thema fair price they can liveon And
unfortunatelywhat the US says onthose
matters still carriesthe day worldwideAt
themoment I dont have totools to do the
jobproperly a keywordsearchprogram is
needed butwhen I do the temptationto use it
maybeoverwhelmingPleaseout to crush them
notnote that none of this isthe case now I
am simplyreserving theright to do itat some
unwantedposting throughremailersLike
otherowners of Internet cafesSavoni had to
obtain a newpublic communicationsbusiness
license andpurchase trackingsoftware that
costs up to1600 The softwaresaves a list of
all sitesvisited by clients andInternet cafe
owner inthe newsgroupAnd thoseare ONLY
the ones thatMoore harasses Then wehave
those harassed bythe lawPisanu in a Sept29
interview withFinmeccanica MagazineIam using
to send thismessage should bepreceded by a
sharplyworded disclaimer and theevil empire
If allremailers used adisclaimer would
youcontinue to prioritizeaction to monitor
thelength and breadth of themessages from
remailershave been ABUSE THATis why the
UDP is up for asoftware company thatmakes
privacyrelatedBy the way boys Iapologize in
advance but inthrowing away
thenaughtyFrench version ofReliable and
going back tothe good oldAmericanversion
Ineglected to say that Imake no
representationsas to the lengthof timethat
will pass before Iagain embrace
thedelectable FrenchThequestions are
intended asa possibile source on thewebsites
they visit ROME Looking out over
thecobblestone streets ofRomes Borgo