THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
BiKiKii Admin wrote:
On 26 Sep 2005, Admin rbtor wrote:
The remailer is running:
Mercury/32 version: Mercury/32, v4.01a
Suggest you install the Mercury/32 v4.01b patch.
See also
http://secunia.com/advisories/13348/
Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:20:31 +0100, Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Eelbash Admin wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:31:40 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal
counsel, I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday
that he has flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.
Why don't you use your one remaining brain cell to read what Zax wrote
again.
He installed nntp filters. Those are for his usenet server.
I stand corrected; but isn't filtering a flood going out through an nntp
server the same, legally, ethically, and morally (what is the difference
between ethics and morals?) as filtering a flood going through an smtp
server?
It is not.
If Zax thinks filtering a flood through an nntp server is ok, then I
still feel that I can appeal to that example as a justification for
filtering a flood going through my smtp server.
Steve is filtering 'floods' (BI and stuff like that). You are filtering on
keywords.
I am filtering on floods not keywords.
And to me Steve's news server is just like any other newsserver that
carries remailer messages. People that complain about anonymous messages
have to complain to the last remailer in the chain.
Even Frog-Admin filtered at his news server. I think he also filtered at
his remailer though, but I am not sure. You are a lot worse when it comes
to filtering and distorting message content. I can't decide if you are a
joke or a danger to the remailing community. Do you even feel you are part
of it?
I hope Zax or Twisty will clear up the legal aspects of this filtering. In
any case, the filtering at Zax' news server is automated and not all
groups are monitored. Only APA-S.
I think you should see the news service and remailer service as separate
identities.
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy" -----BEGIN
PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBQ3HNbwEP2l8iXKAJAQGCQAMeLGdW16ZzdXCuz3E7+gn3GnBlvQgJPkVD
g6ZUsEQto0M/DzthZgVL5EznltfHaA4eOIVJmcXpqHkDA070W9iY3FZajwH/LaJm
Mt2lPRf8xSOCkgA9Z+rD2kKjlhoztDFCTIeBrQ== =ZrxQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Twistycreek re-mailer open to public
In article <WDQJYD4H38640.4142939815@anonymous.poster>
Wolff Wehrkugel <wehrkugel@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:40:03 +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
In article <MIOP4P1V38640.0549537037@anonymous.sender>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Admin_rbtor) wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Send to remailer@twistycreek.com
with subject:
remailer-key
remailer-config
remailer-adminkey
dest-block
Great to see you back!
Me too, but I hope your remailer will not be as up and down as Eelbash has
been.
I doubt it. He was reliable, just had ISP problems.
