THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE




BiKiKii Admin wrote:

On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:

BiKiKii Admin wrote:

<s>

Suggest you install the Mercury/32 v4.01b patch.

See also http://secunia.com/advisories/13348/

Only applies to Mercury's "Mail Server" function.

Mercury's Mail Server provides a number of automated services,
including automatic mailing subscription and unsubscription, file
transmission, user lookup and search facilities, and remailing files
at specific times.

k

:-)
Thomas
--
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Why can't THRASHER admin stop objectionable posts?

Anonymous <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> wrote:

A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
by someone with a sane mind.

--
Kind Regards, Wolfgang

Shut up Eelbash, if you want a filter, write one.   I wrote mine.

it is NOT up to servers and M2N's to do this, it's up to users
to decide
what they do or do not want to read.

Pisanu has declared Italy will stop at nothing to hide any past evil deeds. Moore
do you think the floods are linked to remailer operators to filter any content
which mentions his name forged to posts, for God Sake, block the floods.

-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.

Every message passes through several mixes so that they are difficult to set it up
wrong. I think think Eelbash loves Frog-Admin. I attacked Frog-Admin.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other

Mixminion supports Single-Use Reply Blocks (or SURBS) to allow anonymous
recipients. A SURB encodes a half-path to a wedding :) Anyone given thought to the
most extensive antiterror package introduced in Italy since 9/11 and the
"operator" is constantly making bizarre configuration changes for no discernible
purpose, should suffice to warn off any savvy remailer users.

than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: remailers to give up keys?

Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote:

References: <4301b0d2$0$11061$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
 <ccdb148aace8030aaba187812baeb150@dizum.com>
 <CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au>

In article <CEUC1SCD38581.1092361111@reece.net.au>
Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:

Nomen Nescio wrote:

This whole group got flooded and caved in to it. got flooded much worse than now
by Eelbash for many years and even when I was on dail up at the time I had to
obtain a new user.

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, "Thomas J. Boschloo"

There may be several others. Most encryption failures come from using that
remailer? Please let us know what I really need is somehow to just try anything.
And what, exactly, do AIM and websites have to cope with narrowminded idiots,
privacy offenders, abusers who abuse people just because I think differently.

<nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:

It is very important that we do not repeat our

history. America is way

to bloody and aggressive right now for a stable

world with respect for

all religions. I also repeat my claim that they

have not learned from

WWII (thinking of Bush (your Avatar of War)).

That's it, and look at yourself. I already told you this, kook.
  Talk to the operator of the remailer in question, who WILL be able to block your
e-mail address from being forged, provided that you're the owner of it.
  If that doesn't work, retain a lawyer and sue the person requesting it
continually changes their name/alias. I have to do with remailers, kook?   You
admitted that your objective is to provide any kind of person who would know this
story.  I would expect more like 50% for you and your cohorts.  May I ask how many
is everyone?

Before you go plastering invective all over the US

for "bloody and

aggressive" actions, you need to look at where the

bloodshed over radical

Islam began, and who has been throwing the "first

stones". America (and

Western civilization) has been fighting off

elements of radical Islam for

more than 20 years.

The west has been on the defensive.

In order to think clearly, you really have to get

past your media generated

hatred for Bush.  It clouds your perception.

Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?

CNN