THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK




In article <S6D92E5538644.0064236111@reece.net.au>
Dermott McDermott <dermcderm@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

Somebody named Secure Beer has been mentioned as the floodr or at least one of

the biggest flooders. I am not sure of his reason for flooding if he is the
flooder, but something about wanting to make the remailer system his way and being
blocked by frog admin? I mean frog admin found him flooding or something from the
headers of his messages. And since then this Secure Beer has been having an
unending hissy fit and floods and so on, sort of like a baby stamping his foot.

If that is correct why do you think it is? Is it that the majority of internet

users do not see the importance of Freedom of Speech the way remops do?

Hi Eelbash! Yes, we *still* know this is you. Try harder, you get no
points for effort on this post.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: nym DOS

On 23 Oct 2005, dhm@best.com wrote:

Who is interfering with posters who want to get nyms?

Everyone.

Which anonymous servers here are run by police agencies?

All of them :)

Where is Frog when we need him?

Bluejay ate him :(

Why are there so few recent postings in alt.anonymous.messages?

Because we want to be anonymous. We post in invisible pixels :)

Why is eelnym not working?  I can't even get a reply about nyminfo.

Maybe he is working at becoming a real remop????????

Try these:

hod
komite
panta-rhei
nan

All are up and working. Nan is usually a little shaky though.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: More Reasons To Avoid Eelbash

In article <25YP0S8M38648.7544560185@anonymous.poster>
Wolff Wehrkugel <wehrkugel@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:

In addition that *that* arrogance, already explained, he had the outragousness

to send *this* message.

On Sun,  4 Jan 2004, Anonymous Sender <anonym...@remailer.metacolo.com>
wrote:

On 4 Jan 2004, <admin@[CENSORED].dynu.com> wrote:

You are afflicted with [SOD OFF]ing self-[BLOCKED]ness. How long before you
filter out discussions of [WRONG SPEECH]? [BAD THOUGHT]? [SOD OFF]?
[BANNED]? What else is
"[FLAKE OFF] in civilized discourse" in [FORGET IT]'s [HATE THOUGHT]
little world of
[NICHEVO]ing [VERBOTEN] [NO WAY]ness?

I would defend to the death your right to express your opinion.

Only if your right to free speech does not conflict with [NIEMALS]/[VERBOTEN]

opinions

of what free speech is.

Not at all: the Congo Remailer is open to all opinions, the more diverse,
the better. I treat all messages like the Crown Jewels, faithfully
transmitting them, with due care to obscure any information about the
origin of the message.

[CENSORED]/[NO WAY] = The Net [SOD OFF]

Congo = The Civil Remailer.

[In the interests of promoting civility,
one or more crude expressions have been replaced
with a stamp, in brackets, to symbolize their
unacceptability in civilized discourse]

I love that disclaimer - dare I say it, it's so symbolic.
While the idea behind it is reprehensible, reading that just cracked me
up.