THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- INTERNET FLOODING COCKSUCKER
PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT
PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
In article <4354e2e9$0$11070$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
Whatever it is, it is decremental to the status remailer users have on
usenet. Remops where never liked by the majority of internet users IMHO.
Screw 'em.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Nym creation with Panta - a one way street?
In article <NORWY52R38665.765625@anonymous.poster>
panta-admin <anonymous@panta-rhei.dyndns.org> wrote:
Re-send your reply block to "save AT nym.panta-rhei.eu.org"
Let me clarify this a bit more:
Please create your config message in the normal way, but then send it to
save@... instead of config@....
Thank you for the reply. I have re-sent the configuration
message to the above address and I'll look forward to your reply.
Following my previous message, I should add this comment: I sent
an anonymous message to me using the same remailers as the reply
block, but I didn't receive a reply. There are two
possibilities. Either one of the remailers has a problem or the
administrator of the final destination email address blocks or
rejects emails from anonymous remailers.
If it's the latter case, can you suggest a reliable final
destination email address to use, for example if a webmail
address, then which one could I reliably use?
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Spooks
Olitoktali Mihnjihnfui wrote:
Well, it surely has been asked before, but, how is one to know (believe)
that the CIA spooks are completely plugged into the mixmaster network?
You can't know. That's the reason the remailer software is designed with
the idea that at least some of the network is compromised. Why layered
encryption, remixing, latency, and fragmentation exist. And it's pretty
tough to wrap your brain around the possibility that the *whole* remailer
network is CIA owned... but I suppose it's a possibility.
So run your own remailer if you're ultra paranoid. You'll know that at
least *one* node is safe to use. <g>
--
_?_ Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend.
(@ @) Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
-oOO-(_)--OOo-------------------------------[ Groucho Marx ]--
grok! Registered Linux user #402208
